Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kv0906/pm-kit/docnpx skills add kv0906/pm-kit --skill docgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kv0906/pm-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00509 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
doc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/doc — Document Drafting
Create or edit documents (specs, PRDs, design docs, etc.).
Context
Today's date: !date +%Y-%m-%d
Existing docs: !ls docs/*/*.md 2>/dev/null | tail -10
Reference template: @_templates/doc.md Config: @_core/config.yaml Processing logic: @_core/PROCESSING.md
Input
User input: $ARGUMENTS
Processing Steps
-
Parse Input
- Extract project
- Extract title/feature name
-
Check Existing
- Search
docs/{project}/*.mdfor similar titles (ordocs/general/*.mdif no project) - If found: Offer to edit or create new
- Search
-
Gather Context
- Search for related decisions/blockers
-
Interactive Drafting
- Prompt for each major section:
- Problem statement
- Goals / Non-goals
- Requirements (P0/P1/P2)
- Technical approach
- Or accept full content at once
- Prompt for each major section:
-
Create Doc Note
- If no project specified: write to
docs/general/{slug}.md - If project specified: write to
docs/{project}/{slug}.md - Apply template with gathered data
- Status: draft
- Add
## Linkssection
- If no project specified: write to
-
Update References
- Add to project index if exists
-
Append to Vault Log
- Append entry to
01-index/_vault-log.md(see.claude/rules/vault-log.md) - Action:
doc - Details: doc title and status
- Append entry to
Output
Created: docs/{project}/{slug}.md
Status: draft
Sections: {filled}/{total}
Export (Optional)
Supports --docx, --pdf flags. See .claude/rules/export-formats.md for layout specs and workflow. Complete normal processing first, then generate the formatted file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 72 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A e6c8ca796cd3
doc is a skill published in the GitHub repository kv0906/pm-kit (133 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 509 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
critique-agent
Pressure-test an existing product brief or PRD pack — find gaps, hidden assumptions, inconsistencies, and failure modes before stakeholder review. Use when: critique brief, critique PRD, devils advocate, red team, pressure test, find holes, what could go wrong, stress test the doc, pre-mortem.
interview-frameworks
Frameworks for user interviews, question design, and qualitative research. Use when conducting user interviews, designing interview guides, researching user needs, or gathering qualitative insights. Trigger on: 'create an interview guide', 'how do I interview users', 'customer discovery questions', 'user research…
query-datasets
Answer grounded yes/no questions about what exists in the 03-datasets/ example corpora (supporttickets, calltranscripts) using the local SQLite + FTS5 + vector hybrid index. Use when the user asks 'do/does [corpus] contain/mention/include/have requests for X?', 'any [corpus] about Y?', or similar factual queries over…
critique-prd
Rubric-score a PRD pack (02 + 03) against the 7-dimension PM Brain rubric and run a 4-persona panel review. Returns scores, panel critiques, the single weakest section, a concrete rewrite, and P0/P1 fix lists. Use when: PRD review, score my PRD, rubric review, panel review, rewrite weakest section, critique-prd.
create-prd
Write the PRD pack (02-product-requirements.md + 03-success-metrics.md) on top of an approved product brief. Use when: PRD, product requirements, requirements doc, success metrics, spec writeup, shape the PRD.
create-internal-feature-announcement
Drafts an internal feature announcement (IFA) from the PRD pack and user sources using the repo template, then writes 04-internal-feature-announcement.md. Use when: IFA, internal feature announcement, internal FAQ, Slack IFA prep, launch comms pack, or internal product documentation from the template.