Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/missingpackage/nightshift/writing-plansnpx skills add MissingPackage/nightshift --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MissingPackage/nightshiftWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01645 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to writing-plans — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: If working in an isolated worktree, it should have been created via the superpowers:using-git-worktrees skill at execution time.
Save plans to: docs/superpowers/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
- (User preferences for plan location override this default)
Scope Check
If the spec covers multiple independent subsystems, it should have been broken into sub-project specs during brainstorming. If it wasn't, suggest breaking this into separate plans — one per subsystem. Each plan should produce working, testable software on its own.
File Structure
Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what each one is responsible for. This is where decomposition decisions get locked in.
- Design units with clear boundaries and well-defined interfaces. Each file should have one clear responsibility.
- You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. Prefer smaller, focused files over large ones that do too much.
- Files that change together should live together. Split by responsibility, not by technical layer.
- In existing codebases, follow established patterns. If the codebase uses large files, don't unilaterally restructure - but if a file you're modifying has grown unwieldy, including a split in the plan is reasonable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 174 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A ea48effcfe4d
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository MissingPackage/nightshift (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,645 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to writing-plans, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
baton-setup
One-time setup and health check for fable-baton. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, verify, or troubleshoot fable-baton - sets the default model to "best" (Fable 5 with Opus fallback) in /.claude/settings.json and verifies the plugin is fully installed.
licensing-tiers-data-governance
Implement subscription tiers with field-level access control, feature gating, rate limiting, and compliance tracking. Design data governance systems that enforce different access levels, retention policies, and regulatory requirements based on user subscription tier (Free, Pro, Enterprise).
data-infrastructure-at-scale
Build data infrastructure that scales from prototype to production. Use when architecting data pipelines, choosing data stores, planning for high throughput, or migrating to distributed systems. Covers caching, replication, sharding, message queues, and data lake architecture.
data-provenance
Track data lineage and provenance from source to consumption. Use when auditing data flows, debugging data quality issues, ensuring compliance (GDPR, SOX), or understanding data dependencies. Covers lineage tracking, impact analysis, data catalogs, and metadata management.
multi-source-data-conflation
Merge and reconcile data from multiple sources into a unified view. Use when integrating APIs, consolidating databases, building data warehouses, or creating master data. Covers entity resolution, conflict resolution, data quality, and real-time vs batch conflation.
software-architecture
Design scalable software systems with proven architectural patterns (MVC, microservices, event-driven), SOLID principles, system design trade-offs, and architectural decision records (ADRs).