Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/orkait/hyperstack/shadcn-expertnpx skills add orkait/hyperstack --skill shadcn-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/orkait/hyperstackWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.02273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01137 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
shadcn-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 178 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 5169f9e06c84
shadcn-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository orkait/hyperstack (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,273 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-host-e2e-tests
Use when writing, recording, updating, or troubleshooting the agent host end-to-end tests under src/vs/platform/agentHost/test/node/e2e (black-box tests that drive the whole agent host over the AHP protocol, using a CapiReplayProxy record/replay system for Claude/Copilot/Codex). Covers adding a cross-provider test…
schema-exploration
Lists tables, describes columns and data types, identifies foreign key relationships, and maps entity relationships in a database. Use when the user asks about database schema, table structure, column types, what tables exist, ERD, foreign keys, or how entities relate.
lint-js
Lint JS/TS code only. Use before opening a PR when only JavaScript or TypeScript files were changed (no Rust).
nemoclaw-contributor-implement-issue
Implement an accepted NemoClaw GitHub issue in the current checkout. Use when a user asks to pick up an issue for implementation, implement or fix a named issue, or add the issue's tests. Confirm accepted scope, deliver the smallest independently valuable capability slice, and record validation and remaining gates…
analyze-market
Perform a market analysis for a product category or segment. Trigger on: market analysis, market size, TAM SAM SOM, market opportunity, industry analysis.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.