Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ralph-workflow/ralph-workflow/coding-standardsnpx skills add Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-Workflow --skill coding-standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-WorkflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00050 | $0.03142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00628 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00314 |
Grade A, and why
coding-standards scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
const response = await fetch(url) The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 552 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A e80544c3d1ea
coding-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-Workflow (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 3,142 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
feature-execution
This skill should be used when the user asks to "orchestrate the feature", "run the phases", "resume implementation", "continue the plan", "the phase agent died", "the agent stopped on its usage limit", "accept this phase", "can these phases run in parallel", "is this phase done", "does this shortfall matter", or…
acceptance-agent
Use this agent when a zforge phase has reported DONE and its evidence must be independently verified before the planner accepts it. Typical triggers include $zforge:feature-orchestrate accepting a REPORTED phase during a long chain, and any run where the planner's context is the constrained resource. It reconciles the…
phase-agent
Use this agent when a phase of a zforge feature plan is ready to implement and its work should run in its own context. Typical triggers include $zforge:feature-orchestrate spawning a READY phase, resuming a phase whose agent was interrupted mid-run, and re-running a phase after a decision was rejected in review. See…
template-conventions
This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a feature", "what goes in the phase file", "which file owns this", "what evidence class is this", "how do I verify a claim no test can settle", "where should this doc go", or when writing, reading or updating any zforge feature document under docs/{feature}/.…
async-reasoning
This skill should be used when implementing or designing code with async data flows — "state management design", "async data flow", "stale data", "cache invalidation", "optimistic update", "init order", "race condition", "write then read", "data not updating", "cache not refreshing", "UI shows old data after save"…
retro
This skill should be used when the user asks to "retro", "evaluate zforge", "review plugin performance", "score this session", or wants to assess how well zforge's workflow served a feature. Evaluates zforge's workflow scaffolding, not the project's technical decisions or LLM reasoning quality.