code-quest: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/code-quest-review/SKILL.md

code-quest-review is a skill for Claude Code from recca0120/code-quest. It costs 96 tokens per session (1,709 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Project-specific code review rules for the Code Quest codebase. They check conventions across imports, data schemas, server events, client handlers, React, icons, and tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing Code Quest changes for correct imports, Zod validation, cross-package event wiring, server middleware, React Compiler compatibility, icon usage, and FakeSummoner tests.
Why use it?
They catch mistakes that generic code review may miss, especially when several packages must agree on the same data and event names.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is recca0120/code-quest's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on code-quest itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything code-quest configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to recca0120/code-quest. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/recca0120/code-quest/main/.claude/skills/code-quest-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/recca0120/code-quest

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-quest-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-quest-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/recca0120/code-quest/code-quest-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 96 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,709 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00096 $0.01709
Opus 5.5 $0.00038 $0.00684
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00342
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00171

Measured 2mo ago against content hash d8d89f59c76e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quest-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/code-quest-review/SKILL.md · 116 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quest 專案特定 Code Review

除通用 /code-review skill 的審查維度外,本專案額外檢查以下項目。

Import

  • import 放在檔案最頂部,不要 inline import(函式中間寫 import)
  • Node.js built-in import(node:path, node:fs)放最上方

isolatedDeclarations

summoner package 開啟了 isolatedDeclarations: true,影響:

  • exported 變數必須有顯式型別標注 — 不可依賴推導,這不是冗餘
  • schema 檔(schemas.ts、launch-options.ts)的縮寫型別別名(Opt、Str、Num、Bool、Unk、Loose)是為了簡化這些必要標注,屬合理設計,不應移除
  • 審查時看到 schema export 帶顯式型別,不要標為「冗餘型別標注」

Zod

  • .passthrough() / .loose() → 改 z.looseObject()(Zod v4 deprecated)
  • shared schema 只有一個 package 使用 → 搬到該 package
  • payload as { ... } inline type assertion → 改用 zod schema parse:
    1. 先查 shared schemas 有沒有現有 schema 可用
    2. 沒有才新建,放 shared 讓前後端共用
    3. 不要 inline z.looseObject({...}).parse(payload) — 那只是換一種 inline,應該抽成 named schema

跨 Package 對齊(shared / summoner / server / client)

  • server emitter.on('event', ...) 的 event name 跟 shared socket-events.ts 定義是否一致
  • server ch.sendRequest('event', ...) 的 event name 跟 adapter REQUEST_MAPPINGS 是否一致
  • adapter transformControlRequest 產出的 event name 跟 server handler 訂閱的是否一致
  • client handler on map 的 event name 跟 server emit 給 client 的是否對齊
  • shared ClientToServerEvents / ServerToClientEvents 定義跟實際 emit/on 是否同步

summoner(CLI adapter)

  • REQUEST_MAPPINGS 是否涵蓋所有 ch.sendRequest 呼叫的 event name
  • adapter transform 每個 case 是否都有 named function(不用 inline arrow)
  • isRecord() 等 util 是否集中在 utils.ts,不重複定義
  • ProcessRunner 終止方法只有 kill()(底層呼叫 handle 的 abort())— 不要再加 abort() wrapper
  • console.debug / console.log → 改用 logger(pino),注意 pino API 第一個參數是 object:logger.debug({ err }, 'message')

server handler

  • middleware 是否正確:
    • 需要 channel 且有 callback → withError(withChannel(handler))
    • 需要 channel 無 callback → withChannel(handler)
    • 需要 socket → withSocket(handler)
    • 不需要 channel → 直接註冊
  • handler 使用 ch.sendRequest('event', payload) 不直接用 protocol subtype
  • handler 使用 named function(不用 arrow)
  • handler 內 respondToRequest 只在 auto-respond 或 CLI-initiated event 使用

Read the full file on GitHub · 116 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 116 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A d8d89f59c76e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quest-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository recca0120/code-quest (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,709 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens