Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/romiluz13/cc10x/researchnpx skills add romiluz13/cc10x --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/romiluz13/cc10xWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Synthesis Guidance
Overview
This skill is loaded via SKILL_HINTS by cc10x:planner and cc10x:bug-investigator when the router passes research files in the prompt. It provides instructions for synthesizing web and GitHub research findings.
This skill does NOT execute research. Research execution is done by:
cc10x:researcher (web mode)— prefers Bright Data, falls back to WebSearch/WebFetchcc10x:researcher (github mode)— prefers Octocode MCP, falls back to package/docs/GitHub web research
Synthesis Goal
After the router passes research file paths in your prompt, read the available files and produce a synthesis that:
- Answers the knowledge gap (the
Reasonfield from your prompt) - Identifies the top 2-3 actionable patterns
- Lists gotchas with solutions
- Provides specific references for debugging
- Reflects evidence quality honestly
- States the single finding that most changed the recommendation
What Makes Good Synthesis
Include:
- Cross-source confirmation (when web + GitHub agree on a pattern, it's reliable)
- Primary-source preference: prefer the source that owns the claim — spec, first-party docs, shipped code. A secondary write-up citing a primary loses to the primary.
- Conflict resolution: when sources disagree, code-backed, cross-confirmed findings override single-source prose; shipped code overrides docs (docs describe intent; code is what runs). Partial matches (one strong source only) require adaptation — state the adaptation rationale explicitly.
- Confidence calibration from the router-provided
## Research Qualityblock - Gotchas the user probably hasn't considered
- Specific code snippets only when they materially change the recommendation
Exclude:
- Raw dump of all findings (summarize)
- Obvious things the AI already knows
- Findings not relevant to the specific
Reasonfor research
Same-Name Disambiguation
A name (package, repo, handle) is not a unique key. Researchers routinely retrieve content where one name collides across distinct entities — two npm packages publish under the same name, the same handle exists on two platforms run by different people, a repo name is forked or squatted under multiple owners. This is retrieval noise, not a source conflict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 116 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 25b1d0acaaa3
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository romiluz13/cc10x (164 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,231 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-request
Create, update, or scan per-task request tickets for progress tracking. These are date-prefixed non-lifecycle docs under requests/, NOT feature-level requirements (use /req-analyze for those). Use when: tracking task progress, updating completion status, scanning incomplete requests, checking request status dashboard.…
codex-setup
Initialize sd0x-dev-flow infrastructure for Codex CLI and other non-Claude agents. Generates AGENTS.md, installs the commit-msg hook, copies runner scripts. The pre-push gate is opt-in via --with-push-gate. Use when setting up a new project or after updating skills.
codex-code-review
Code review using Codex MCP. Use when: PR review, code audit, second opinion on changes. Not for: doc review (use doc-review), security audit (use security-review). Output: severity-grouped findings + merge gate.
meta-harness-terminal-bench-2
Run one iteration of AgentHarness evolution for Terminal-Bench 2.
meta-harness
Run one iteration of memory system evolution. Called by metaharness.py or interactively via /meta-harness.
adr
Write an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) for a feature — Context / Decision / Status / Consequences / Alternatives, filed as docs/features/ /adr- - .md with a 3-digit zero-padded number. Handles the Superseded case: bidirectional linking when a new ADR replaces an old one. Use when: recording why an architectural…