Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/telagod/code-abyss/securing-systemsnpx skills add telagod/code-abyss --skill securing-systemsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/telagod/code-abyssWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00993 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
securing-systems scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
攻防秘典
判断先于执行：决定「是否做 / 选什么 / 如何取舍」（栈、方案、架构、权衡）前，先读领域判断内核
skills/_kernel/security/SKILL.md——它管 judgment，本秘典管 execution；冲突时以内核判断为准。
安全工程总路由：通用攻防视角与红队 / 蓝队 / 紫队实战知识。 专域工作（应用安全防御、云原生加固、检测工程、安全架构）走专门 skill。 信级：项目文件 > 标准库 > 训练记忆（标
[unverified]）
路由
攻防基础（本 skill 内）
| 意图 | 秘典 | 核心 |
|---|---|---|
| 渗透测试 | pentest | Web/API/内网、OWASP、BOLA、JWT、GraphQL |
| 代码审计 | code-audit | 危险函数、污点追踪、Source→Sink |
| 红队攻击 | red-team | PoC、C2、横移、免杀、供应链 |
| 蓝队防御 | blue-team | 检测、SOC、IR、取证、密钥轮换 |
| 威胁情报 | threat-intel | OSINT、威胁狩猎、ATT&CK 建模 |
| 漏洞研究 | vuln-research | 逆向、Exploit、Fuzzing、PWN |
| 执行模式 / CTF 沙箱 | authorization-tiers | T1/T2/T3、CTF 目标默认沙箱 |
专域路由（其他 skill）
| 意图 | 走 skill | 适用 |
|---|---|---|
| 应用层防御（XSS / SQLi / OAuth / LLM AppSec） | defending-applications | 写代码 / 修 CVE / 鉴权设计 |
| 云原生 + 供应链加固 | securing-cloud-and-supply-chain | K8s / CI/CD / SLSA / 云 IAM |
| 检测工程 + 蓝紫队 | detecting-and-responding | Sigma / EDR / IR / 威胁狩猎 |
| 安全架构 + 合规 + 身份 | architecting-security | 威胁建模 / 零信任 / SOC2/PCI |
执行链
攻：侦察 → 武器化 → 投递 → 利用 → 安装 → C2 → 行动
守：预防 → 检测 → 响应 → 恢复
紫队：ATT&CK → 红攻 → 蓝检 → 缺口 → 闭环
输出约束
- 安全测试代码输出须标注使用场景（Security Testing / Defense Validation / Security Research）
- 涉及真实 IP / 域名时使用 RFC 5737 保留地址（
192.0.2.0/24、198.51.100.0/24）或example.com - 凭证、密钥、Token 一律使用占位符（
<REDACTED>、<TARGET-TOKEN>） - 每个攻击技术附带检测 / 缓解建议，攻防一体呈现
优先级
| 场景 | 排序 |
|---|---|
| 攻击模拟 | 效果 > 精准 > 控制 |
| 防御响应 | 正确 > 覆盖 > 速度 |
| 紧急事件 | 速度 > 正确 > 简洁 |
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 60 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 421fa1ef6a87
securing-systems is a skill published in the GitHub repository telagod/code-abyss (240 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 993 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
codexkit-a-b-test-planner
Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.
codexkit-api-design-reviewer
Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.
codexkit-architecture-decision-writer
Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.
codexkit-audit-readiness-checker
Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when…
codexkit-business-case-writer
Write structured business cases with problem framing, options analysis, financial modeling (NPV/ROI/Payback), risk assessment, and implementation roadmap. Follows HBR business case structure. Use when seeking budget approval, proposing new initiatives, or justifying investment decisions.
codexkit-campaign-brief-writer
Write agency-standard creative briefs for marketing campaigns. Structure Background, Objective (SMART), Target Audience persona, Key Message, Mandatories, KPIs, Timeline, and Budget Allocation. Use when briefing agencies, creative teams, or internal marketing on a new campaign.