hyper-plan-loop

A command for finding the international manufacturer part number behind an Israeli product listing. A part number is the manufacturer's identifier for a product or replacement item.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for toner, filters, replacement parts, and accessories when you need to verify compatibility, compare prices abroad, or distinguish genuine products from compatible alternatives.
Why use it?
Israeli retailers may use local product numbers that are difficult to search internationally. Matching the canonical number helps confirm that foreign listings describe the same item.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zeikar/hyperclaude/hyper-plan-loop
Any agent
npx skills add zeikar/hyperclaude --skill hyper-plan-loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zeikar/hyperclaude

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,964 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00071 $0.03964
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.01982
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00793
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00396

Measured 2d ago against content hash da9b4539a021, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

hyper-plan-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/hyper-plan-loop/SKILL.md · 198 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

hyper-plan-loop

Autonomous plan-hardening gate. Spawns the planner agent once, has it write its plan to .hyperclaude/plans/<YYYYMMDD-HHMM>-<slug>.md, runs Codex plan-review through the bridge, and revises via the still-live planner until Codex returns no blocking findings (judged by meaning, not Codex severity labels) or the cap is hit. The planner is spawned once; every revise round reuses its retained context. The reviewer is always the Codex bridge, never an agent — this preserves the "Claude builds, Codex reviews" invariant.

When to use

  • User typed /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-loop <task>.
  • User wants an autonomous plan → review → revise cycle in a single gesture.

Skip when:

  • The task is one step — dispatch the implementer agent directly (pass run_in_background: false for the result inline).
  • You want hands-on control over each plan / review round — use /hyperclaude:hyper-plan + /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-review manually.

Failure & recovery protocol — read first

${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/loop-protocol.md carries the shared cross-loop protocol: Spawn contract, Reply transport, Correctives and transport failures, Shared anti-patterns. references/failure-protocol.md (sibling of this file) is the plan-loop binding layer: it names this loop's reply shape (WROTE: <path>), the exact-path accept rule, the post-acceptance file/structure validation, the named reports, and what a transport failure preserves. Step 0 makes Reading BOTH mandatory before the loop starts.

Spawn & reply transport

See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/loop-protocol.mdSpawn contract for the Agent / SendMessage argument shapes, Reply transport for how each round's reply reaches the lead. Loop-specific bindings:

  • Plan ownership: the planner writes the canonical plan file itself via caller-directed write-file mode (its Step 2 prompt carries the exact resolved path). The lead never Writes or Reads the plan body on the normal path — it does only a quiet ok/bad structure check, and only Reads the body for human-facing failure diagnostics. Every write-file-mode reply (initial write, corrective redo, revise) is gated to WROTE: <path>-only (Step 3 accept rule).

Read the full file on GitHub · 198 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 198 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A da9b4539a021

Subscribe to this mod's changes

hyper-plan-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository zeikar/hyperclaude (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,964 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.