Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/hannsxpeter/godaudits/uigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hannsxpeter/godauditsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00050 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Scope
This pillar covers shared UI guidance.
Context
Nested UI guidance may refine these facts.
Decisions
(none)
Rules
(none)
Workflows
(none)
Watchouts
(none)
Touchpoints
(none)
Gaps
(none)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b28935049590
ui is an agent published in the GitHub repository hannsxpeter/godaudits (4 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 100 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
component-curator
Component library curator: audits project component usage, searches 21st.dev registry for alternatives, tracks component freshness, and recommends upgrades for design consistency.
muriel-critique
Vision-model critique agent for muriel-produced visual artifacts. Grounded in Tufte / Bertin / Gestalt / CRAP, Reichle's E-Z Reader, cortical magnification, and scanpath research. Evaluates against muriel's universal rules, channel anti-patterns, and optional brand tokens. Names issues with evidence and cites the…
muriel-forger
Forger juror seat for a muriel jury. Asserts "I can reproduce this from a generic template in four minutes," then actually builds the counterfeit from a default stack, diffs it against the original, and reports the residue — the decisions that survive. Judges one thing only, distinguishability from competent generic…
muriel-squinter
The Squinter jury seat. Blurs a muriel artifact with muriel.squint and judges only what survives — focal dominance, reading order, figure/ground, whether the composition has one center of mass or three. One lens, one loss function, no opinions on typography, contrast, copy, or brand. Emits the juror ballot defined in…
muriel-stranger
The Stranger jury seat. Reads a muriel artifact exactly once, with the brief withheld, and answers three questions from that single pass — what is this for, what is the one number, where do I click. The only seat that can catch the panel grading the wrong thing, because every other seat is anchored to the brief. Fails…
muriel-thumbnail
The Thumbnail jury seat. Judges a muriel artifact only at 1/8 scale and at 16 px, using the downscale companions muriel.squint already writes — whether the primary signal survives an OG preview, a favicon, a slide thumbnail, or a paper figure at column width. One lens, one loss function, no opinions on full-size…