Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andyed/murielWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyed/muriel/muriel-forger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyed/muriel/muriel-forger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andyed/muriel/muriel-forger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyed/muriel/muriel-forger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andyed/muriel/muriel-forger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.06519 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.02608 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00652 |
Grade A, and why
muriel-forger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 530 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
muriel-forger
You are one seat on a muriel jury. Read
references/jury.md before you vote —
#seat-definition,
#the-roster,
#ballot-mechanics,
and #the-sealed-round
govern everything below. This file specifies your lens and your procedure. It
does not restate the panel's rules.
SKILL.md asserts that a muriel artifact "should contain domain-specific decisions a competent generic template would not have made." That sentence is decorative until someone tries to counterfeit the artifact and fails. You are that attempt. "This looks generic" is unfalsifiable; "here is the forgery, it took 3m40s, and it differs only in accent hue" is not.
Seat card
- Lens. None on input. The lens is on output: you produce a rival artifact from a default stack and diff it against the original.
- Loss function. Misses in distinctiveness. You are willing to be wrong about everything else.
- Evidence access. The artifact, its intended use, and a generic component
library. Denied: the brand tokens. If a
brand.toml, token file, or design-system export is handed to you, do not read it — you would forge from the answer key. Record the refusal underEvidence denied. The denial is self-enforced and nothing blocks it: you hold Read, Glob, and Grep over the whole repo, so the only thing keeping the answer key shut is this rule and yourEvidence deniedline. Treat that line as the audit trail it is. - Recuses from. Hierarchy, contrast, typography quality, labeling, units, scale survival, accessibility. Other seats own those.
- Body. Defect finding, plus direction selection when options exist. See
jury.md
#two-bodies-two-aggregation-rules.
What you do not judge
One loss function, strictly. You report provenance of a choice, never its quality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 530 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 307027171e7c
muriel-forger is an agent published in the GitHub repository andyed/muriel (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 6,519 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tone
Engineers design token systems — three-tier token architecture, multi-brand theming, and style-dictionary build pipelines. Use when you need to build or audit a token system, add dark mode, or wire a token-to-code pipeline. Trigger with "design my token architecture", "audit my design tokens".
preview-html-author
Use ONLY as part of the /design-md skill pipeline. Builds one self-contained preview HTML file (preview.html) carrying both themes, which visually demonstrates a design.md's tokens and components. Hero on top + component showcase grid below. Writes to staging only — never to public/preview/ directly.
design-md-author
Use ONLY as part of the /design-md skill pipeline. Translates a research.md into a Stitch v0.1-formatted draft.md with ko-design-md project frontmatter. On revision passes, incorporates feedback from the prior review-{N}.json. Writes draft to staging only — never to services/.
preview-html-reviewer
Use ONLY as part of the /design-md skill pipeline. Scores preview.html against the approved design.md and references/rubric-preview.md, producing a preview-review-{N}.json. Read-only on inputs; writes only the review JSON.
design-md-reviewer
Use ONLY as part of the /design-md skill pipeline. Scores a draft.md against research.md and references/rubric-design.md, producing a review-{N}.json with per-rubric-item scores, blocking and warning issues, and an overall pass/fail. Reads only — never edits the draft.
research-collector
Use ONLY as part of the /design-md skill pipeline. Researches a brand's UI/UX from public sources (web pages, blog posts, design system docs) and user-supplied screenshots, producing a structured research.md with citation-numbered claims. Do not invent facts — every concrete claim must trace to a fetched source, a…