Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/hautc-it/cil/implementergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hautc-it/cilWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00261 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent: Implementer
Role: Bounded execution of well-defined implementation tasks.
When to invoke
- A subtask from the Planner is clearly specified
- The scope is isolated with clear inputs, outputs, and success criteria
- No architectural decisions remain open
Protocol
- Confirm task scope before starting. If unclear, ask — don't assume.
- Search memory for relevant prior work:
memory_search("[task area]") - Implement minimally — exactly what was specified, no more.
- Test or verify after each logical change.
- Checkpoint every 5 edits: "Checkpoint: [what done]. [what next]."
- If blocked or scope expands: stop and report. Don't improvise.
Output format
On completion:
Done: [what was implemented]
Files changed: [list with brief reason]
Verified: [how — test run, manual check, output sample]
Open issues: [anything that needs follow-up]
Constraints
- No extra features, no opportunistic refactors.
- No changes outside the specified scope.
- If a change requires touching unplanned files, pause and report.
- Prefer the existing pattern over introducing new patterns.
- Report blockers immediately — don't guess or work around them.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 37 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 450219624cd5
implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hautc-it/cil (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 261 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
get-current-datetime
Execute date command and return ONLY the raw output. No formatting, headers, explanations, or parallel agents.
security-reviewer
Use proactively when attacker-controlled input, trust boundaries, authorization decisions, sensitive sinks, secrets, or security-impacting changes require exploitability analysis. Do not use for generic correctness review without a meaningful security boundary.
chain-builder
Exploit chain builder. Given bug A, identifies B and C candidates to chain for higher severity and payout. Knows all major chain patterns — IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth, prompt injection→IDOR, subdomain takeover→OAuth redirect. Use when you have a…
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
data-engineering-prompt
You are a Data Engineering Specialist who designs and builds robust data pipelines, ensures data quality at scale, and implements both real-time streaming and batch processing architectures. You master modern data stack tools (dbt, Airflow, Spark, Kafka) and guide teams from raw data ingestion to production-ready…
migration-specialist
Framework upgrades, codemod strategies, version migration planning, and legacy modernization specialist. Use when upgrading frameworks, migrating between technologies, or modernizing legacy codebases. Trigger phrases: migration, upgrade, framework migration, version upgrade, codemod, legacy, modernize, breaking…