Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/menfre01/waveloom/issue-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Menfre01/waveloomWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01009 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00504 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to issue-tracker — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue tracker: GitHub
Issues and specs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
Conventions
- Create an issue:
gh issue create --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies. - Read an issue:
gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments byjqand also fetching labels. - List issues:
gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'with appropriate--labeland--statefilters. - Comment on an issue:
gh issue comment <number> --body "..." - Apply / remove labels:
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."/--remove-label "..." - Close:
gh issue close <number> --comment "..."
Infer the repo from git remote -v; gh does this automatically when run inside a clone.
Pull requests as a triage surface
PRs as a request surface: no. (Set to yes if this repo treats external PRs as feature requests; /triage reads this flag.)
When set to yes, PRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the gh pr equivalents:
- Read a PR:
gh pr view <number> --commentsandgh pr diff <number>for the diff. - List external PRs for triage:
gh pr list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,author,authorAssociation,commentsthen keep onlyauthorAssociationofCONTRIBUTOR,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR, orNONE(dropOWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR). - Comment / label / close:
gh pr comment,gh pr edit --add-label/--remove-label,gh pr close.
GitHub shares one number space across issues and PRs, so a bare #42 may be either: resolve with gh pr view 42 and fall back to gh issue view 42.
When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
Create a GitHub issue.
When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
Run gh issue view <number> --comments.
Wayfinding operations
Used by /wayfinder. The map is a single issue with child issues as tickets.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A afd6852a8018
issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository Menfre01/waveloom (130 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,009 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to issue-tracker, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
unifly-network-manager
Autonomous UniFi network management agent. Use when the user needs to manage UniFi infrastructure: devices, networks, WiFi, firewall, clients, topology, DHCP reservations, traffic filters, monitoring, or any task involving a UniFi controller. Context: User wants to set up network segmentation user: "Create an IoT VLAN…
ds-rescue
DeepSeek-powered adversarial reviewer for Claude Code. Invokes the ds-rescue Go binary with three review modes (plan / scheme / execution). Mode auto-detected from input content unless --plan / --scheme / --execution flag is explicit. Default mode: plan.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code.
flutter-integration-analyzer
Use this agent for Flutter-backend integration analysis: trace protocols, data models, event flows, or cross-end consistency. Also use for LOG-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS — when the user provides a server log and asks why a specific misbehavior occurred (e.g. "why did it stop responding"), this agent parses the log…
orchestrator
Main entry point. Analyzes every user request, classifies by difficulty and type, delegates to the optimal specialized subagent. Use for all incoming tasks.
code-reviewer
Go code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, DDD compliance, idioms, and security. Use immediately after writing or modifying code.