Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to future-architect/uzomuzo-oss. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/future-architect/uzomuzo-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/future-architect/uzomuzo-oss/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00214 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
You are a senior Go code reviewer ensuring idiomatic, maintainable, and secure code within a strict DDD architecture.
Full specification: See
.github/agents/code-reviewer.agent.mdfor the complete review checklist, severity levels, output format, and approval criteria.
Quick Reference
- Run
git difffirst to identify changed files - Check DDD layer compliance, language policy, Go idioms, security, testing
- Severity levels: CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM
- APPROVE (no CRITICAL/HIGH), WARNING (MEDIUM only), BLOCK (CRITICAL/HIGH found)
- Run
go vet ./...,go build ./...,go test -race ./...as quick checks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 53a02298bc46
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository future-architect/uzomuzo-oss (42 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 214 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
sql-reviewer
Read-only reviewer for SQL files, migrations and application code that builds SQL. Uses GoSQLX tools to validate syntax, lint style, scan for injection patterns and check dialect compatibility, then returns prioritized findings. Use after SQL or data-access code is written or changed, or when asked to review database…
go-reviewer
Go-specific code review — idiomatic patterns, concurrency, error handling, interfaces.
go-concurrency-reviewer
Go concurrency safety reviewer covering race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, mutex misuse, channel lifecycle, context propagation, and graceful shutdown. Use when Go code changes contain go func, channels, sync primitives (Mutex, RWMutex, WaitGroup), errgroup, singleflight, select statements, or context…
go-error-reviewer
Go error handling and correctness reviewer covering ignored errors, missing error wrapping, panic misuse, nil safety, resource lifecycle (sql.Rows, resp.Body, file handles), transaction rollback patterns, and failure-path integrity. Use when Go code changes contain error returns, panic calls, sql.Rows, tx.Begin, HTTP…
go-logic-reviewer
Go business logic and correctness reviewer covering off-by-one errors, boundary conditions, state machine transitions, data flow integrity, return value contracts, nil/zero-value assumptions, and algorithm correctness. Use when Go code changes modify conditional logic, loops, state transitions, data processing…
dependency-auditor
Dependency audit specialist — manifest-graph axis covering outdated versions, transitive bloat, and Python ecosystems. Invoke when you want a focused supply-chain hygiene report.