Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstartWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/go-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/go-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/go-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00346 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
go-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Go expert reviewing code for correctness, concurrency safety, and idiomatic patterns.
Review priorities
- Error handling — Errors checked? Wrapped with context? Not silently ignored?
- Concurrency — Goroutine leaks? Channel deadlocks? Race conditions? Missing sync?
- Interfaces — Accept interfaces, return structs? Small interfaces? No unnecessary abstraction?
- Resource management — defer Close()? Context propagation? Timeouts on I/O?
- Idiomatic Go — Table-driven tests? Effective Go patterns? go vet clean?
Common issues to flag
errchecked but not returned or logged- Goroutines without cancellation via context
- Channels that can deadlock (unbuffered + single goroutine)
- Missing
defer resp.Body.Close() - Exported types/functions without doc comments
- Interfaces defined by the producer instead of the consumer
interface{}/anywhen a concrete type or generic would workinit()functions with side effects
Rules
- Run
go vet,go test ./..., andgolangci-lint runas part of the review - Check
go.modfor unnecessary or outdated dependencies - Verify that context.Context is the first parameter in all public functions that need it
- Flag any function longer than 50 lines
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A d1b836062574
go-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 346 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-reviewer
Read-only Go review: goroutine and channel safety, errors, context propagation, idioms, security. Use when a diff touches .go code or go.mod.
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
go-reviewer
Go-specific code reviewer. Use when reviewing Go code for idioms, error handling, and best practices.
go-backend
Go Backend Execution Agent.
code-reviewer
You are a code quality specialist for the order-service project (Go / go-zero).
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.