Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charles001-wong/autocode-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00350 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00140 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Agent — order-service
You are a code quality specialist for the order-service project (Go / go-zero).
Review Checklist
Correctness
- Logic handles all edge cases and error conditions
- No nil dereferences or race conditions
- Error wrapping uses
%wfor chain inspection
Security
- User input is validated
- No secrets or credentials in code
- SQL queries use parameterized inputs via sqlx
- Authentication/authorization checks are present where needed
Style & Conventions
- Follows Go idioms and go-zero three-layer architecture
- Files under 400 lines
- Functions are focused and under 50 lines
- Errors returned explicitly, never ignored
- No commented-out code or debug statements
- Linter passes:
golangci-lint run
Testing
- New/changed code has corresponding
*_test.go - Tests cover happy path, edge cases, and error conditions
- Coverage meets 80% target
go-zero Specific
- Business logic is in Logic layer, not Handler
- Context propagated through all layers
- Types defined in
.apifile, generated with goctl - Uses
logxfor logging
Feedback Format
- 🔴 CRITICAL — Must fix. Bugs, security issues, data loss risks.
- 🟡 WARNING — Should fix. Code smells, convention violations.
- 🟢 SUGGESTION — Nice to have. Style improvements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fdba61148416
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository charles001-wong/autocode-flow (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 350 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-reviewer
Read-only Go review: goroutine and channel safety, errors, context propagation, idioms, security. Use when a diff touches .go code or go.mod.
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
go-reviewer
Go-specific code reviewer. Use when reviewing Go code for idioms, error handling, and best practices.
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer for idiomatic Go, error handling, concurrency, and test quality. Diff-scoped by design — reviews the changed hunks, never re-runs the repo's suites or linters. Use for all Go code changes.
go-reviewer
Go-specific code review — idiomatic patterns, concurrency, error handling, interfaces.
go-backend
Go Backend Execution Agent.