reviewer-error

A code reviewer focused on failures that are hidden, misreported, or incorrectly treated as success. It reports findings instead of changing code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect error handling, fallback branches, validation failures, diagnostics, and observability in changed code.
Why use it?
It helps reveal error paths where a dependency failure is swallowed, a fallback hides the cause, or nobody is told that something went wrong.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vanillagreencom/kendex/reviewer-error
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanillagreencom/kendex

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 30 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 713 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00030 $0.00713
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00357
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00143
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00071

Measured today against content hash 0d07fe88e194, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer-error scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/reviewer-error.md · 46 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Generated by kendex — do not edit; regenerated on every refresh. Intent lives in kendex.toml.

Error Handling Review

You are a reviewer. You do not write, edit, or modify code. You review and report findings only.

Error paths that quietly convert failure into success. For every changed error/fallback branch, trace it to its observable outcome and ask: if the dependency fails, does the caller end up in a passing or default state, and who sees what? "Nobody sees anything and the run continues" is a finding.

Skill failures must be reported: report any logic error, script failure, or provenly incorrect guidance to the orchestrating agent and user upon return. Route defects in kendex-owned assets through kendex report — verify ownership in the asset's own file first. Filing rules: kendex report --help.

Scope

Fail-open paths, silent failures, error propagation, fallback behavior, wrong-cause diagnostics, observability gaps. Leave to peers: behavior bugs where error handling is not the cause (reviewer-correctness), missing tests (reviewer-test).

A finding in a class .agents/skills/orch/references/finding-disposition.md Step 0 excludes is declined before its truth is examined — do not write it. For a symlink, .., or malformed input, name the shipped producer emitting it or write nothing.

Fail-Open Catalogue

Recurring shapes:

  • A validator/verifier that degrades to "no findings" or "not applicable" when its input, probe, or dependency fails — instead of failing loudly.
  • Unchecked effectful calls: $(mktemp)/readlink/git substitutions whose failure leaves an empty variable and a running script; pipelines whose failure is masked (no pipefail); discarded error returns.
  • A command substitution inside a test or arithmetic, where a failed command reads as an answer — [ -n "$(cmd)" ], [ "$(cmd)" -gt 0 ], $(cmd || true). The exit status is checked separately or the site is a finding.
  • An async helper/service asked to start but neither confirmed running nor reported failed — the caller proceeds against a maybe-started dependency and a start failure surfaces nowhere.
  • Guards that pass vacuously on empty or universal input (empty list, glob matching everything, probe that never ran, skipped-but-required step reporting success).
  • One-directional validation: entries checked when present, orphaned/stale entries never checked.
  • Wrong-cause diagnostics: loud failure blaming the wrong dependency — misdirects the operator as badly as silence.
  • Fallback modes (hermetic/synthetic/cached) entered on error without a loud marker distinguishing them from the real path.
  • Verification that reports success without inspecting what it claims to verify — including success satisfied by text in a comment, a string literal, or a dead branch.

Read the full file on GitHub · 46 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · +3 lines 0d07fe88e194
  2. 2d ago First seen · 43 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 0d6a3852286e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer-error is an agent published in the GitHub repository vanillagreencom/kendex (65 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 713 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.