agent-browser-issue

A workflow for reporting reusable problems in browser-use tools, such as failed clicks, dropdowns, file uploads, or focus handling, as GitHub issues. It captures the page, attempted action, failure, expected result, and a minimal reproduction.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when browser automation is blocked by a likely reusable tool problem and the task would benefit from a documented GitHub follow-up.
Why use it?
It separates tool limitations from login blocks, website bugs, and one-off glitches. A concise issue gives the browser-tool maintainers enough detail to investigate and fix repeatable failures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/udecode/plate-template/agent-browser-issue
Any agent
npx skills add udecode/plate-template --skill agent-browser-issue
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/udecode/plate-template

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 346 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00057 $0.00346
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00173
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00069
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00035

Measured 2d ago against content hash 0477f8c6e3dd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-browser-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to agent-browser-issue — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/agent-browser-issue/SKILL.md · 70 lines

What it actually says

Agent Browser Issue

Handle $ARGUMENTS.

Use this only for likely reusable agent/browser tooling bugs. Do not use it for:

  • auth or SSO gates
  • manual human gates
  • product bugs on the site itself
  • one-off flaky noise with no minimal repro

Collect

Capture only the minimum:

  • page or URL
  • action attempted
  • exact block
  • expected vs actual
  • minimal repro
  • screenshot only if it adds signal

Issue

Open a GitHub issue with:

  • a short title focused on the browser/tool failure
  • label agent:browser
  • concise body

Body shape:

## URL
<url>

## Action
<what the agent tried>

## Block
<what failed>

## Expected
<what should have happened>

## Actual
<what happened instead>

## Repro
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

After

  • if the browser/tool failure exposes a user-action parity gap, load agent-native-reviewer and note that gap in the issue
  • link the issue in the task caveat or handoff
  • keep moving if the product task is still otherwise fixable
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 70 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 0477f8c6e3dd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-browser-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository udecode/plate-template (59 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 346 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-browser-issue, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.