Documents the results of a completed technical or design spike, capturing the original question, approach, evidence-backed findings, and a clear proceed-or-not recommendation so the team does not re-litigate the exploration. Use once a time-boxed investigation has concluded. For the architecture decision the spike…
Creates a structured competitive analysis comparing features, pricing, and positioning across 3-5 direct and indirect competitors, with a 2x2 map and actionable strategic recommendations. Use before entering a market, planning differentiation, or after losing deals. For market size rather than competitor positioning…
Synthesizes user research interviews into actionable insights, patterns, and recommendations. Use after conducting user interviews, customer calls, or usability sessions to extract and communicate findings across participants. Distinct from foundation-meeting-recap, which summarizes one internal meeting for its…
Maps a customer journey across stages, touchpoints, emotional curve, pain points, and moments of truth into a markdown artifact with an optional mermaid timeline or flowchart. Use when synthesizing existing research into the shape of a customer's experience, end-to-end or for one phase. Without research signal yet…
Estimate market opportunity (TAM, SAM, SOM) using multiple sizing frameworks (top-down, bottom-up, comparable company, analogous market). Triangulates across frameworks, highlights where they converge and diverge as signal, and produces a calibrated range with source-graded confidence labels. Refuses unbounded…
Maps the people and groups with a stake in a project, documenting their needs, concerns, influence, and engagement approach. Use at project kickoff, when taking over from another PM, or when resistance signals misalignment. For the update you send to those stakeholders, use foundation-stakeholder-update instead; this…
Runs a fast pre-build risk review on a product idea, feature request, or scope change, naming the single assumption most likely to make it fail and returning a clear verdict (build small, validate first, pivot first, or don't build yet) with a no-code validation step. Use before committing build effort, when triaging…
Produces a one-page lean canvas across nine interlocking blocks (problem, customer, UVP, solution, channels, revenue, cost, metrics, unfair advantage) with optional inline HTML and SVG visual rendering. Use when framing a new product thesis, stress-testing an existing strategy, comparing strategic options…
Produces an attendee-facing agenda that sets what will be discussed, who owns each topic, and how time will be spent. Supports ten meeting type variants (standup, planning, review, decision-making, brainstorm, 1-on-1, stakeholder-review, project-kickoff, working-session, exec-briefing). Emits a shareable summary…
Produces a private strategic preparation document for the user before a meeting that matters. Captures stakes, stakeholder positions and reads, ranked desired outcomes, key messages, anticipated questions with prepared responses, risks and tensions, specific asks, and success signals. Distinct from meeting-agenda…
Produces a topic-segmented post-meeting summary for attendees with decisions highlighted and actions captured inline per topic (plus a consolidated action view at the end). Auto-populates topic skeleton from a sibling meeting-agenda when available and reconciles planned vs. actual topics. Accepts transcripts from…
Cross-meeting archaeology skill. Consumes multiple meeting recaps (or raw notes) over a period and surfaces patterns invisible in any single meeting. Shows how decisions evolved, who has been saying what, where threads are stalling, and where contradictions have emerged. Produces a plain-text timeline, themes with…
Drafts, reviews, rewrites, and coaches outcome-based OKR sets across team, department, product, or company scopes. Supports five entry modes (Guided default, One-Shot via --oneshot, Sustained Coach, Audit Only, Rewrite). Diagnoses empowered-team context and adjusts framing; refuses to fabricate baselines or targets…
Instructions for product-on-purpose/pm-skills-mcp, covering claude code instructions, project context, documentation rules, public vs private files and skills directory.
An evidence-graded library of agent-executable thinking-method skills (premortem, problem restatement, and more). Each skill is reduced to its working mechanism, graded honestly on how strong its evidence actually is, and produces a concrete artifact rather than prose. Use to reframe a problem, challenge assumptions…
14 15d agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
Instructions for product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills, covering thinking-framework-skills - agent guide, what makes a skill here different, skills, recipes and skill anatomy.
Researches a named thinking method, grades its evidence honestly on the seven-tier model, assesses overlap against the shipped catalog, drafts its learning dossier, and emits a schema-valid proposed registry entry for human review. Use for bounded framework research or a "discover N candidates in family X" brief.…
Check whether a conclusion is sound before trusting it, by sorting evidence from inference, reconstructing the inferential climb, and reviewing through separated lenses.
Break past the obvious option set by reframing the problem, transforming the seed with SCAMPER, and reversing its foundational assumptions, then shortlisting candidates.
Reason from fundamentals by decomposing a problem to its irreducible level, then stripping the inherited assumptions, so you rebuild from what is actually necessary rather than from convention or analogy.
Decide which of a batch of candidate ideas are worth committing to, by scoring them on explicit quality dimensions and then adversarially stress-testing the strongest few.
Turn a tangled multi-question deliberation or transcript into an inspectable typed map by chaining shipped moves, surfacing the open issues, attaching rival positions to each, and running a pro/con pass on each position, so a sprawling debate becomes a navigable structure.
Run the Kepner-Tregoe rational process as a chain of shipped moves, taking a bounded operational problem through cause-finding, then a weighted choice among options, then a forward risk pass, so a fix is de-risked end to end.