Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaobei930/cc-bestWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01300 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00650 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/verify - 综合验证命令
一键执行完整验证流程,确保代码质量。适用于提交前、合并前、发布前的最终检查。
设计理念: 将多个验证步骤整合为一个命令,避免遗漏检查项。
使用场景
| 场景 | 触发时机 |
|---|---|
| 提交前 | /cc-best:dev 完成后,/cc-best:commit 前 |
| 合并前 | PR 准备合并到主分支前 |
| 发布前 | 版本发布前的最终检查 |
| 问题排查 | 快速定位哪个环节有问题 |
验证流程
📋 详细验证流程(6 Phase 步骤、各语言命令、通过标准)参见预加载的
skills/security/verify-checklist.md
按顺序执行 6 个 Phase:构建检查 → 类型检查 → Lint 检查 → 测试套件 → 安全扫描 → Git 状态检查。
与其他命令的关系
/cc-best:dev (开发完成)
↓
/cc-best:verify (综合验证) ←── 本命令
↓
├─ PASS → /cc-best:qa (功能验收) → /cc-best:commit
└─ FAIL → 修复问题 → 重新 /cc-best:verify
自定义配置
项目可在 package.json 或 pyproject.toml 中配置验证命令:
// package.json
{
"scripts": {
"verify:build": "npm run build",
"verify:type": "tsc --noEmit",
"verify:lint": "eslint .",
"verify:test": "vitest run",
"verify:security": "npm audit"
}
}
如果存在 verify:* 脚本,优先使用项目自定义命令。
输出规范
遵循 rules/output-style.md,采用结构化报告格式。
📋 详细报告格式模板、状态定义参见预加载的
skills/security/verify-checklist.md
验证通过输出
══════════════════════════════════
VERIFICATION: PASS ✅
══════════════════════════════════
Phase 1 Build: [PASS]
Phase 2 Type: [PASS]
Phase 3 Lint: [PASS] (2 warnings)
Phase 4 Test: [PASS] 42/42
Phase 5 Security: [PASS]
Phase 6 Git: [INFO] 3 files modified
➡️ 下一步: /cc-best:commit 提交代码
验证失败输出
══════════════════════════════════
VERIFICATION: FAIL ❌
══════════════════════════════════
Phase 1 Build: [PASS]
Phase 2 Type: [FAIL] 3 errors
Phase 3 Lint: [SKIP]
Phase 4 Test: [SKIP]
Phase 5 Security: [SKIP]
<details>
<summary>错误详情</summary>
src/user.ts:42 - Type 'string' is not assignable to 'number'
...
</details>
➡️ 下一步: 修复类型错误后重新 /cc-best:verify
验证失败后操作
- 更新 progress.md — 在当前任务下记录验证失败信息(失败 Phase + 错误摘要 + 修复方向)
- 回到 Dev 修复 — 输出指引回 /cc-best:dev(或 /cc-best:dev --bugfix,如果是 QA 返工轮次中的验证)
- 安全问题优先 — Phase 5 Security 失败标记为 P0,优先修复
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 175 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 05637d3dceb8
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository xiaobei930/cc-best (50 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,300 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
al
Run AgentLint diagnostic across all projects. Use when: user says /al, 'check all projects', 'agent lint', or '体检'.
tldr
Re-apply TLDR rules for this turn (verdict first, no filler).
moyu-lite
Invoke the moyu:moyu-lite skill and follow it exactly.
audit-plugin
Audit plugin skills, commands, and agents for structure, size, and naming issues.
lfe-dep-audit
Inspector sub-skill. Reviews dependency manifest files (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pom.xml) changed in the current diff for risky version patterns and stale majors. Emits a human-run audit instruction rather than executing tools. Writes .plans/checks/depfindings.md. Called by lfe-inspector…
lfe-plan-critique
Run a 5-lens pre-build critique of the approved active plan before the Builder starts. Acts as the Architect persona, read-only on src/. Writes .plans/plancritique.md. Use immediately after Brain approves activeplan.md.