Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/veigap/talksmith/feedback-cyclenpx skills add veigap/talksmith --skill feedback-cyclegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/veigap/talksmithWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00075 | $0.02157 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01078 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
talksmith:feedback-cycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
talksmith:feedback-cycle — Step 5 (Review) iteration helper
Owns the mechanical bookkeeping of the Step 5 feedback loop end-to-end:
- Detect unstamped presenter bullets in
draft.md. - Stamp each as
[open] YYYY-MM-DD — "<verbatim>". - Close each (after the Editor applies the content fix) as
[closed]with aResolution:continuation line. - Mirror every
[closed]row toconfig/feedback-backlog.mdfor the cross-Talk audit trail. - Sanity-check that no
[closed]bullet indraft.mdis missing its mirror row.
Plus two Step-6 helpers:
-
Rescue still-
[open]bullets fromfinal.mdinto the# Open questionssection (so they survive the strip pass) —find_open_notes.py/rescue-open. -
Strip every
Presenter feedbackfield out offinal.mdat Step 6 (d) —strip_feedback.py— removing both authored forms (H3 / paragraph) and guaranteeing a blank line before every---slide boundary so a strip can never fuse two slides into a setext-H2 heading. Deterministic; the Editor never hand-strips these blocks.python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/feedback-cycle/strip_feedback.py talks/<Talk>/final.md [--dry-run]
The LLM Editor calls these as CLI subcommands and only authors three things per bullet: the per-slide content fix, the one-sentence resolution, and the tag list. Every line edit on draft.md and every row appended to feedback-backlog.md goes through this skill — the Editor does not read draft.md end-to-end during a normal Review round.
When to use
- Every Step 5 (Review) round. Start with
find-opento get the precise bullet list, thenstamp/ apply fix /close/mirror-rowper bullet, thenfind-closed-unmirroredas a sanity check. - Step 6 (c) Polish. Run
rescue-openonce againstfinal.mdto copy any surviving[open]bullets into# Open questionsbefore Step 6 (d) strips Presenter-feedback fields. - Spot-check after applying feedback — re-run
find-opento confirm nothing was missed.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 132 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A e985841201d9
talksmith:feedback-cycle is a skill published in the GitHub repository veigap/talksmith (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 2,157 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…