refactoring

A guided workflow for reorganising and cleaning up code in fdic-mcp-server.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to understand the current code, make a focused structural change, run relevant checks, and summarise remaining review needs.
Why use it?
It gives refactoring work a clear sequence and reminds you to check that existing tests still pass.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jflamb/fdic-mcp-server/refactoring
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jflamb/fdic-mcp-server

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 188 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00188
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00094
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00038
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00019

Measured 2d ago against content hash 88a3f4c72662, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to refactoring — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/refactoring.md · 35 lines

What it actually says

/refactoring

Use this workflow when working on refactoring in fdic-mcp-server.

Goal

Code refactoring and cleanup workflow

Common Files

  • src/**/*

Suggested Sequence

  1. Understand the current state and failure mode before editing.
  2. Make the smallest coherent change that satisfies the workflow goal.
  3. Run the most relevant verification for touched files.
  4. Summarize what changed and what still needs review.

Typical Commit Signals

  • Ensure tests pass before refactor
  • Refactor code structure
  • Verify tests still pass

Notes

  • Treat this as a scaffold, not a hard-coded script.
  • Update the command if the workflow evolves materially.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 35 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 88a3f4c72662

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactoring is a command published in the GitHub repository jflamb/fdic-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 188 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to refactoring, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.