Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AlekseiUL/sprut-agent-kit --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlekseiUL/sprut-agent-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alekseiul/sprut-agent-kit/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alekseiul/sprut-agent-kit/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alekseiul/sprut-agent-kit/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alekseiul/sprut-agent-kit/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alekseiul/sprut-agent-kit/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01047 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00419 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Систематическая отладка
Железное правило
НИКАКИХ ФИКСОВ БЕЗ ПОНИМАНИЯ ПРИЧИНЫ
Рандомные фиксы тратят время и создают новые баги. Если не прошёл Фазу 1 - нельзя предлагать решения.
Когда использовать
Любая техническая проблема:
- Крон не запустился / выдал ошибку
- Скрипт падает
- Gateway не отвечает
- Docker контейнер упал
- Память не ищет нужное
- Бот не отправляет сообщения
- Любое "раньше работало, теперь нет"
Особенно когда: под давлением, "очевидный фикс" напрашивается, уже пробовал 2+ решения.
Четыре фазы
Фаза 1: Расследование причины
ПЕРЕД любым фиксом:
-
Прочитай ошибку целиком
- Не пропускай стектрейсы и warnings
- Часто ответ прямо в тексте ошибки
- Запиши: файл, строка, код ошибки
-
Воспроизведи
- Можешь повторить проблему?
- Какие точные шаги?
- Если не воспроизводится - собирай больше данных, не гадай
-
Что изменилось?
git diff, последние коммиты- Обновление платформы? (проверь версию)
- Новые зависимости, конфиг?
memory/progress-log.md- что делалось недавно
-
Проследи поток данных Для многокомпонентных систем (крон → gateway → агент → tool → результат):
На каждом стыке: - Что входит? - Что выходит? - Где ломается?
Фаза 2: Анализ паттерна
- Найди рабочий пример - похожий скрипт/крон который работает
- Сравни - что отличается между рабочим и сломанным?
- Проверь зависимости - всё ли на месте (docker, npm, пути, права)?
Фаза 3: Гипотеза и тест
- Сформулируй гипотезу - "Я думаю причина в X потому что Y"
- Минимальный тест - ОДНО изменение, ОДНА переменная
- Проверь - сработало → Фаза 4. Нет → новая гипотеза
- НЕ лепи фиксы поверх - если не сработало, откати и думай заново
Фаза 4: Реализация фикса
- Фикси причину, не симптом
- Одно изменение за раз
- Проверь - проблема ушла? Ничего другого не сломалось?
- Запиши -
bash scripts/progress-log.sh+ daily notes если важное - Если 3+ фикса не сработали - СТОП. Проблема архитектурная. Обсуди с Алексеем.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 103 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 743e1ce9f9cd
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlekseiUL/sprut-agent-kit (65 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,047 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. 4-phase root cause investigation — NO fixes without understanding the problem first.
ha-logs
A read-only troubleshooting skill for querying Hope Agent’s local SQLite databases, which store logs, conversations, and background-job status.
ha-self-diagnosis
Self-understanding and issue reporting for Hope Agent itself. Use when the user asks how Hope Agent works internally, asks about its own source code/docs/runtime behavior, reports a bug/failure/slowness/crash, asks to diagnose logs, or asks to create/submit a GitHub issue for a bug, feature request, or improvement…
nightly-audit-engineer-getting-started
A first-conversation guide for setting up a code-audit assistant. A code audit is a focused review of source code for defects or risky behavior, with the needed repository, scope, concerns, permissions, and schedule clarified first.
sentry-app-setup
Create and configure a Sentry internal integration so the assistant can manage issues, alerts, and releases under its own identity.
nightly-audit-engineer-ops
A workflow for reviewing code for reproducible quality problems and recording the evidence behind each finding. It follows data through inputs, permissions, storage, asynchronous work, and recovery, then suggests the smallest authorized fix.