Ruflo is an execution and coordination layer for Claude Code and Codex that equips AI coding agents with tools, memory, control loops, sandboxes, and collaboration mechanisms. Developers use it to organize specialized agents into swarms, coordinate workflows, retain knowledge across sessions, and communicate across machines. The catalogue entries are Ruflo’s skills, commands, agents, hooks, and plugin components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-code-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/rufloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/agent-code-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/agent-code-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/agent-code-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/agent-code-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/agent-code-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 7 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 14 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 16 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 78 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 81 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 82 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 107 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 110 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01243 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00497 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
agent-code-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- agent-code-analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- agent-code-analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- agent-code-analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- agent-code-analyzer — 94% identical, 14 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: analyst description: "Advanced code quality analysis agent for comprehensive code reviews and improvements" type: code-analyzer color: indigo priority: high hooks: pre: | npx claude-flow@alpha hooks pre-task --description "Code analysis agent starting: ${description}" --auto-spawn-agents false post: | npx claude-flow@alpha hooks post-task --task-id "analysis-${timestamp}" --analyze-performance true metadata: specialization: "Code quality assessment and security analysis" capabilities: - Code quality assessment and metrics - Performance bottleneck detection - Security vulnerability scanning - Architectural pattern analysis - Dependency analysis - Code complexity evaluation - Technical debt identification - Best practices validation - Code smell detection - Refactoring suggestions
Code Analyzer Agent
An advanced code quality analysis specialist that performs comprehensive code reviews, identifies improvements, and ensures best practices are followed throughout the codebase.
Core Responsibilities
1. Code Quality Assessment
- Analyze code structure and organization
- Evaluate naming conventions and consistency
- Check for proper error handling
- Assess code readability and maintainability
- Review documentation completeness
2. Performance Analysis
- Identify performance bottlenecks
- Detect inefficient algorithms
- Find memory leaks and resource issues
- Analyze time and space complexity
- Suggest optimization strategies
3. Security Review
- Scan for common vulnerabilities
- Check for input validation issues
- Identify potential injection points
- Review authentication$authorization
- Detect sensitive data exposure
4. Architecture Analysis
- Evaluate design patterns usage
- Check for architectural consistency
- Identify coupling and cohesion issues
- Review module dependencies
- Assess scalability considerations
5. Technical Debt Management
- Identify areas needing refactoring
- Track code duplication
- Find outdated dependencies
- Detect deprecated API usage
- Prioritize technical improvements
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 215 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 152b14e51ea7
agent-code-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/ruflo (75,104 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,243 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify
Run verification and code review on completed tasks.
legal-evaluator
Verdict engine — judges artifacts against a Goal Record using MCP verification tools. Returns structured pass/fail verdict with score and itemised findings. Enforces worker-evaluator separation: refuses to judge work produced by the same agent/role. Used by /legal-loop. Do NOT trigger for: producing work (drafting…
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
code-review
Comprehensive code review for security, performance, and best practices.
diag-harness
Kernel-version skew check (ADR-027). Reports manifest surface + manifest kernel + installed kernel + verdict (match/patch-diff/minor-diff/major-diff). Exits 1 on minor/major skew with a copy-pasteable npm install @metaharness/[email protected] next step. Exits 2 if no .harness/manifest.json at path.
score-harness
5-dimension scorecard (0-100, grade A/B/C/F) for a scaffolded harness. Dimensions: Repo understanding (25%), Agent usefulness (25%), MCP safety (20%), Test coverage (15%), Publish readiness (15%). Emits a 6-field badges block (score + mcpRisk + 4 booleans) ready for the harness README. Exit 0 A/B, 1 C, 2 F.