Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dansasser/claude-code-marketplaceWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00246 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00123 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quick coverage check.
Purpose
Run just the test coverage analysis without the full pipeline.
Process
- Run pytest with coverage
- Check against threshold (default 80%)
- Report files below minimum
Usage
/coverage
Output
COVERAGE CHECK
Overall: 87.3%
Branch: 82.1%
Threshold: 80%
All files above minimum (60%)
Status: PASS
Or on failure:
COVERAGE CHECK
Overall: 72.5% (need 80%)
Shortfall: 7.5%
Files below 60% minimum:
- src/auth.py: 45.2%
Uncovered: lines 23-24, 45, 67, 89-91
- src/api.py: 58.1%
Uncovered: lines 12, 34, 56
Status: FAIL - Coverage below threshold
Note
This is a quick check - it does NOT update pipeline state. For full pipeline with state tracking, use /preflight or /gate 2.
Use the coverage agent for this check.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cfd66ddcf4fc
coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository dansasser/claude-code-marketplace (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 246 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
tests
Run the Week 4 backend test workflow. Build TESTARGS from $ARGUMENTS: use backend/tests when it is empty; prepend backend/tests when it starts with an option such as -k; otherwise use the supplied path or node ID as-is.
verify
Grade work that already exists and decide whether it can merge. Runs the project's current unit, integration, and E2E suites plus security scanning and type checking, scores every dimension 0-10, and returns a merge verdict with a VERIFIED-vs-CLAIMED evidence manifest. Writes no test files and edits no source. Use…
test-tdd
Run when user calls /test-tdd. Scans modified files, locates their corresponding unit/integration test suites, and runs them.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
kill-mutants
Analyze surviving mutants from a mutation testing run and write targeted unit tests to kill them. Re-runs mutations to confirm kills.
test-ts
Run TypeScript tests for Solana frontends and Anchor programs.