test-driven-development

A development method called test-driven development, or TDD, where you write an automated test before the code, confirm that the test fails, then write the smallest code that makes it pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for new features, bug fixes, refactoring, and behavior changes by following the failing-test, passing-code, and cleanup cycle.
Why use it?
It checks that a test actually detects missing behavior and helps reduce regressions when adding features, fixing bugs, or changing existing code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/frogobox/frogo-sdk/test-driven-development
Any agent
npx skills add frogobox/frogo-sdk --skill test-driven-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frogobox/frogo-sdk

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,486 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00017 $0.02486
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.01243
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00497
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00249

Measured 2d ago against content hash e32cf31b2f12, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to test-driven-development — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md · 379 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 379 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Overview

Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.

Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.

Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.

When to Use

Always:

  • New features
  • Bug fixes
  • Refactoring
  • Behavior changes

Exceptions (ask your human partner):

  • Throwaway prototypes
  • Generated code
  • Configuration files

Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.

No exceptions:

  • Don't keep it as "reference"
  • Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
  • Don't look at it
  • Delete means delete

Implement fresh from tests. Period.

Red-Green-Refactor

digraph tdd_cycle {
    rankdir=LR;
    red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
    verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
    green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
    verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
    refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
    next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];

    red -> verify_red;
    verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
    verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
    green -> verify_green;
    verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
    verify_green -> green [label="no"];
    refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
    verify_green -> next;
    next -> red;
}

RED - Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen.

const result = await retryOperation(operation);

expect(result).toBe('success'); expect(attempts).toBe(3); });

Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
</Good>

Read the full file on GitHub · 379 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 379 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A e32cf31b2f12

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository frogobox/frogo-sdk (21 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,486 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

unit-testing

为 BK-CI 代码编写单元测试时使用,例如 JUnit5、MockK、测试组织、依赖 Mock、异常校验和 TDD 场景。当用户要补测试或用测试驱动实现时优先使用。.

TencentBlueKing/bk-ci · 56 tokens

testing-expert

Ultimate Kotlin testing skill. Use this whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging ANY Kotlin test — unit, integration, property-based, or coroutine. Covers TDD (RED/GREEN/REFACTOR), Kotest + MockK + Kover, anti-pattern detection, and four-pillar quality framework. Triggers on: write a test, add coverage, why is this…

JosephSanjaya/skills · 115 tokens

engram-testing-coverage

TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 25 tokens

code-assist

Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.

mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator · 53 tokens

nostr-expert

Nostr protocol implementation patterns in Quartz (AmethystMultiplatform's KMP Nostr library). Use when working with: (1) Nostr events (creating, parsing, signing), (2) Event kinds and tags, (3) NIP implementations (80+ NIP packages in quartz/), (4) Event builders and TagArrayBuilder DSL, (5) Nostr cryptography…

vitorpamplona/amethyst · 182 tokens

compose-slot-api-pattern

Use when designing or reviewing a reusable Jetpack Compose component whose visual regions vary by caller, or when primitive content parameters and boolean shape flags are accumulating. Technique-layer skill — complements the codebase-specific compose-expert.

vitorpamplona/amethyst · 48 tokens