Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gentleman-programming/engram/testing-coveragenpx skills add Gentleman-Programming/engram --skill testing-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/engramWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00211 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
engram-testing-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Adding new behavior
- Fixing a bug
- Refactoring logic with branch complexity
TDD Loop
- Write a failing test for the target behavior.
- Implement the smallest code to pass.
- Refactor while keeping tests green.
- Add edge/error-path tests before closing.
Coverage Rules
- Cover happy path + error paths + edge cases.
- Prefer deterministic tests over flaky integration paths.
- Add seams only when branches are impossible to trigger naturally.
- Keep runtime behavior unchanged when adding seams.
Validation Commands
Run:
go test ./...
go test -cover ./...
Report package coverage and total coverage in the PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 49 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 94b7e626c8e3
engram-testing-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/engram (6,266 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 211 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-integration
Run all three agent integration phases sequentially: research, write-tests, and implement using E2E-first TDD (unit tests written last). For individual phases, use /agent-integration:research, /agent-integration:write-tests, or /agent-integration:implement. Use when the user says "integrate agent", "add agent…
test-generation
Use when the user asks for tests, mentions TDD, or when new code has been written and needs test coverage.
code-assist
Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
test-driven-development
Strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle enforcement. Tests are never skipped or deferred. Run mode only, never watch mode. Exit code evidence mandatory.
css-design-tdd
Test-driven CSS design system modifications. Run checks before/after CSS changes to verify token usage, variable definitions, fallbacks, and consistency. Use when modifying CSS tokens, fixing design inconsistencies, or auditing CSS architecture.