Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core --skill mobiai-mobile-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArisGuimera/MobiAI-CoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-mobile-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-mobile-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-mobile-tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-mobile-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-mobile-tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 118 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 151 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01804 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00902 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00361 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
mobiai-mobile-tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mobile Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
When to Use
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Delete means delete
Red-Green-Refactor
digraph tdd_cycle {
rankdir=LR;
red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];
red -> verify_red;
verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
green -> verify_green;
verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
verify_green -> green [label="no"];
refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
verify_green -> next;
next -> red;
}
RED - Write Failing Test
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
Android (Kotlin):
@Test
fun `should emit error state when API returns failure`() {
coEvery { repository.fetchData() } returns Result.failure(IOException())
viewModel.loadData()
assertEquals(UiState.Error("Failed to load"), viewModel.state.value)
}
Run: ./gradlew testDebugUnitTest --tests "com.example.MyViewModelTest"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 255 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A d03ce59d384e
mobiai-mobile-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core (453 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,804 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
android-testing
Use when writing, fixing, or refactoring Android/KMP code in Kotlin — a test-first (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR) foundation plus the Android/KMP test traps: Compose-test dispatching (StandardTestDispatcher default, the two-schedulers trap), semantics-first selectors, choosing the smallest test shape, test-clock vs wall-clock…
flutter-quality
A quality-check guide for Flutter and Dart projects, where Flutter is a framework for building apps and Dart is its programming language. It runs analysis, formatting, tests, and optional coverage checks.
swift-tdd-workflow
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with XCTest including unit, integration, and XCUITest E2E tests.
iOS Testing
Unit testing, UI testing, TDD patterns, mocking, and test doubles for VIP+W architecture.
shared
A shared collection of general working methods and Android storage guidance for other add-ons to reuse.
ax-testing
Skill "ax-testing" from Kasempiternal/axiom-v2, covering testing, quick patterns, swift testing basics, suites and traits and parameterized tests.