Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add morodomi/dev-crew --skill flutter-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/dev-crewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/dev-crew/flutter-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/dev-crew/flutter-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/dev-crew/flutter-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/dev-crew/flutter-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/dev-crew/flutter-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00179 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Tools
analyze: dart analyze | format: dart format | test: flutter test | coverage: flutter test --coverage
Standards
| 項目 | 目標 |
|---|---|
| Analyze | issues 0 |
| Format | エラー0 |
| カバレッジ | 90%+ |
Reference
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 482811254240
flutter-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository morodomi/dev-crew (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 179 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
plan
Analyzes architecture, selects patterns, assesses testability, then decomposes work into ordered TDD tasks with exact verification commands and explicit acceptance mapping. Works from an approved spec (zuvo:brainstorm output) or directly from a user-provided description.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
x-qdev
A compact development workflow for a small, clearly defined code change. It keeps the requirement, initially failing tests, implementation, and real verification results in one task document, following TDD, or test-driven development.
Eval-Driven Skill Design
A review guide for new coding-agent skills that checks whether each skill has both examples it should catch and examples it should ignore, plus evaluation setup.
validate-plan
Validate implementation plans against DRY, YAGNI, TDD principles and best practices. Use when reviewing plans from pocket-planning or another planning workflow to identify gaps, anti-patterns, and improvement opportunities before execution.
Component Test Scaffold (Next.js)
Generate React/Next.js component test skeletons (RTL) from specifications.