Agent Claude Code
Evaluate the manuscript as a connected argument rather than a set of individually acceptable sections. Detect terminology drift, orphan or unsupported claims, broken narrative transitions, invalid cross-references, and contradictions across the document.
Agent Claude Code
Turn the approved project brief into the structural foundation for an academic document. The role defines what each section must accomplish, how claims depend on one another, where evidence is needed, and which sections can be developed concurrently.
Agent Claude Code
Determine whether proposed section plans are likely to produce the intended academic outcome. Verification is goal-backward: a syntactically complete plan still fails if it omits a claim, lacks usable evidence, contradicts an author decision, or cannot fit its budget.
Agent Claude Code
Improve clarity, rhythm, concision, and authorial voice without changing technical meaning, evidence, citation placement, or argumentative direction. Polishing is a constrained transformation, not a substantive rewrite.
Agent Claude Code
Investigate the literature needed to plan and write a specific section well. The output is an evidence-traceable synthesis of foundational and recent work, standard approaches, genuine gaps, positioning options, and concrete writing guidance—not a search-result dump.
Agent Claude Code
Convert one approved section goal into small, executable writing plans. A plan is a precise writing contract: it connects claims, evidence, word budgets, sequencing, author decisions, and measurable completion criteria without pre-writing the section.
Agent Claude Code
Review a section as an academic evaluator and produce prioritized, actionable feedback. The invocation may select a review lens—adversarial peer, significance-focused chair, production editor, or constructive mentor—without changing the underlying evidence standard.
Agent Claude Code
Execute an approved section plan into evidence-grounded academic prose or the explicitly requested scaffold. Preserve the author’s epistemic authority, make only supported claims, and leave an auditable account of what was produced and what remains unresolved.
Command Claude Code
Capture a bounded note or task without disrupting the active research flow.
Command Claude Code
Analyze a bibliography and map its evidence to the paper's sections and claims.
Command Claude Code
Run readiness checks across section completion, arguments, length, citations, and reviews.
Command Claude Code
Audit citation integrity and emit a validated corrected-bibliography candidate without mutating source records or manuscript inputs.
Command Claude Code
Review pending tasks and explicitly act on, defer, complete, or dismiss each one.
Command Claude Code
Save, list, or restore an exact portable paper-state checkpoint.
Command Claude Code
Guide a bounded WTF-P contribution from branch creation through a reviewable change request.
Command Claude Code
Build the section structure, argument map, dependencies, and word budgets.
Command Claude Code
Transform the paper's argument, methods, and findings into a concise academic poster.
Command Claude Code
Transform the paper's argument, evidence, and findings into an audience-appropriate presentation.
Command Claude Code
Capture the researcher's intended purpose, essential content, voice, and boundaries before planning.
Command Claude Code
Draft independent section waves in parallel and verify cross-section coherence.
Command Claude Code
Export the manuscript and bibliography to portable LaTeX source with declared formatting.
Command Claude Code
Render the stable WTF-P action reference from the canonical catalog.
Command Claude Code
Insert a newly discovered section while preserving established numbering and dependencies.
Command Claude Code
Preview the intended approach and assumptions for a section without changing project files.
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: