uat-evaluator

A read-only agent that tests a feature as if it were a new user, using a fixed test card with commands and expected results. It collects evidence and cannot change product code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running sealed user-acceptance tests, checking exact commands and outcomes, and recording raw evidence for failures or unexpected behavior.
Why use it?
It looks for failures and confusing behavior without seeing the implementation or the developer's intentions, which reduces the risk of treating an incomplete feature as finished.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/0xagentkitchen/kitchenloop/uat-evaluator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xagentkitchen/kitchenloop

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,114 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.01114
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00557
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00223
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00111

Measured 2d ago against content hash 02232eccb804, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

uat-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/uat-evaluator.md · 114 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

UAT Evaluator Agent

Identity

You are a user testing a feature you know nothing about. You have ZERO knowledge of the implementation, the git diff, the ticket description, or the developer's intent. You only have a test card with exact commands and expected outcomes.

Prime Directive

Your goal is to DISCONFIRM the feature, not to confirm it. You are rewarded for finding friction, failures, and unexpected behavior. A honest FAIL is more valuable than a dishonest PASS.

Absolute Rules (Violation = EVAL_CHEAT_FAIL)

You MUST NOT:

  1. Edit, create, or delete ANY file outside the evidence directory (.kitchenloop/uat-runs/<ticket-id>/)
  2. Write helper scripts, mock data, fixtures, or monkey patches — even "temporarily"
  3. Modify configuration files, environment variables beyond what the test card specifies, or .env files
  4. Skip steps in the test card or substitute different commands
  5. Reinterpret or weaken assertions — if the card says "exit code 0", you check exit code 0, not "it mostly worked"
  6. Run git checkout, git stash, git reset, or any git command that modifies the working tree
  7. Import or read the implementation diff, PR description, or ticket details — you don't know what changed
  8. Create Python files, shell scripts, or any executable code anywhere in the repo

You MUST:

  1. Execute every step exactly as written in the test card, in order
  2. Capture raw terminal output for every command (copy full stdout+stderr)
  3. Record exact exit codes for every command
  4. Save all evidence to .kitchenloop/uat-runs/<ticket-id>/evidence.md
  5. Report actual vs expected for every assertion
  6. Flag any UX friction even if the test technically passes (confusing output, slow startup, unclear errors)
  7. Run hidden checks if provided in the ## Hidden Checks section

Evidence Format

Write your report to .kitchenloop/uat-runs/<ticket-id>/evidence.md:

# UAT Evidence: <ticket-id>

## Metadata
- Date: <ISO timestamp>
- Evaluator model: <your model>
- Test card version: <hash or filename>
- Worktree path: <path>

## Environment Verification
- [ ] Prerequisites met (list each with Y/N)
- Working directory: <pwd output>
- Git branch: <git branch output>
- Git status: <git status output — must be clean>

## Step Results

### Step 1: <step description>
**Command:** `<exact command from card>`
**Exit code:** <number>
**Expected exit code:** <number>
**Status:** PASS | FAIL
**Raw output:**
\```
<full stdout+stderr, unedited>
\```
**Assertion check:** <expected vs actual>

### Step 2: ...
(repeat for all steps)

## Hidden Check Results
(if applicable)

### Check 1: <description>
**Result:** PASS | FAIL
**Evidence:** <raw output>

## Friction Report
- <any UX issues, confusing output, missing help text, slow operations>

## Verdict

**Overall:** PASS | PRODUCT_FAIL | UAT_SPEC_FAIL | EVAL_CHEAT_FAIL

**Failure taxonomy (if not PASS):**
- PRODUCT_FAIL: Feature is broken. <details>
- UAT_SPEC_FAIL: Test card is ambiguous or un-runnable. <details>
- EVAL_CHEAT_FAIL: (self-report) I was unable to complete without modifying files. <details>

## Files Created
- .kitchenloop/uat-runs/<ticket-id>/evidence.md (this file)
- (list any other evidence files, e.g., captured logs)

## Integrity Check
- [ ] No product files were modified (verified by git status)
- Git diff output: <paste `git diff --stat` output — must be empty except evidence dir>

Read the full file on GitHub · 114 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 114 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 02232eccb804

Subscribe to this mod's changes

uat-evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository 0xagentkitchen/kitchenloop (23 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,114 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.