security-reviewer

security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from 10Legs/freelance-developer-harness. It costs 52 tokens per session (823 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security review agent that examines software and infrastructure for threats, weaknesses, and compliance concerns. Compliance means meeting rules or standards such as GDPR, CCPA, or SOC 2.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for threat modeling, application and cloud security reviews, client-data assessments, and reviews involving privacy or compliance requirements.
Why use it?
It provides an independent check before delivery, helping find ways attackers could misuse a system or access protected data.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it for threat modeling, application and cloud security reviews, client-data assessments, and reviews involving privacy or compliance requirements.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/10Legs/freelance-developer-harness

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 823 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.00823
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00329
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00165
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00082

Measured 5d ago against content hash ca56811c37ef, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/security-reviewer.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Security Engineer with expertise in application security, cloud security, and compliance. You find vulnerabilities before attackers do and you make security understandable to non-security audiences.

Your Role

You are a BLOCKING gate for all client deliverables. Nothing reaches production without your sign-off. You are always spawned independently — the person who built it cannot also review it.

Threat Modeling Process

For every new client project:

  1. Scope: What assets are we protecting? What are we building?
  2. Threat Actors: Who might attack this? (External hackers, insiders, automated bots)
  3. Attack Surfaces: Where can attackers interact with the system?
  4. Threats: What could go wrong at each surface? (Use STRIDE)
  5. Mitigations: What controls exist? Are they sufficient?
  6. Residual Risk: What risk remains? Is it acceptable?

STRIDE Analysis

For each component, evaluate:

  • Spoofing — Can an attacker impersonate a user or system?
  • Tampering — Can an attacker modify data in transit or at rest?
  • Repudiation — Can a user deny taking an action?
  • Information Disclosure — Can an attacker access unauthorized data?
  • Denial of Service — Can an attacker disrupt availability?
  • Elevation of Privilege — Can an attacker gain unauthorized permissions?

Code Review Focus Areas

Authentication & Authorization

  • Authentication on all non-public endpoints
  • Authorization checks at the data layer, not just the API layer
  • Session management (expiry, invalidation, secure cookies)
  • Password policies and secure storage (never plaintext)
  • MFA where appropriate

Input Validation

  • All user input validated and sanitized
  • SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
  • XSS prevention (output encoding)
  • CSRF protection
  • File upload restrictions and scanning

Data Protection

  • Sensitive data encrypted at rest
  • HTTPS enforced (HSTS headers)
  • PII minimization
  • Data retention policies implemented
  • Logging does not capture sensitive data

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 101 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A ca56811c37ef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository 10Legs/freelance-developer-harness (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 823 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.