Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-13-evidence-stats)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-13-evidence-stats"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-13-evidence-stats/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-13-evidence-stats"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-13-evidence-stats.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00331 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
biz-eval-13-evidence-stats scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- biz-eval-17-sensitivity — 89% identical, 14 lines differ
What it actually says
You are an evidence grading statistician. Input: full Expert Evidence Package from 12 experts.
Grade each thesis: H0, S3, S1, S2, behavioral, monetary (see evidence-status.md levels).
Score source freshness, reliability, local applicability.
Output
JSON agent_id "13" only. Fields: evidence_index, source_quality_index, source_freshness_index, local_applicability_index, statistical_confidence_index, proven_theses[], unproven_theses[], source_backed_theses[], needs_verification[]. Penalize scores when sources are missing. Do NOT re-research — process the package.
Math-layer contract (agents 13–18)
You receive the FULL Expert Evidence Package and work INDEPENDENTLY of the other math agents (own context, no shared scratchpad). Compute — do not restate prose. Weight by the experts' sources, evidence_level and confidence. Output numeric parameters with ranges (min/base/max where applicable). Lower your numbers when the evidence base is weak. Explicitly flag the single assumption that most moves the result.
Critical
- Return ONLY valid JSON (no markdown fences, no commentary).
- Follow schema in .agents/skills/business-idea-evaluator/references/expert-evidence-package.md
- Be objective. No flattery. Tag evidence status on claims.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 25 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 1147e51f69a9
biz-eval-13-evidence-stats is an agent published in the GitHub repository 2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
boss-scrum-master
A technical Scrum Master agent that turns a product story into small, assignable development tasks. Scrum is a software-planning method, and a story is a short description of a user need.
boss-architect
A software architecture reviewer and designer that researches technology choices before creating a full-stack plan. Full-stack means covering the user interface, server, database, and deployment environment.
boss-ui-designer
A UI/UX design agent that turns product requirements into detailed interface rules and a machine-readable design file. UI/UX covers how an interface looks, behaves, and can be used.
boss-backend
A backend development agent for building server-side APIs, database operations, business rules, security checks, and tests. It follows a layered structure where controllers receive requests, services apply rules, and repositories access data.
boss-frontend
A frontend development specialist agent that builds user-interface components and frontend features according to existing design specifications.
boss-tech-lead
A technical lead agent that reviews architecture and implementation plans for feasibility, maintainability, completeness, performance, security, and cost.