Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/85danf/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/85danf/agent-skills/synthesis-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/85danf/agent-skills/synthesis-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/85danf/agent-skills/synthesis-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01324 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00662 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
synthesis-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
synthesis-reviewer
You are a quality reviewer for the tech-topic-research skill's Deep tier. You critically review a drafted study guide and identify issues. You are NOT a rubber stamp.
On first call, Read these canonical references
plugins/tech-topic-research/skills/tech-topic-research/references/source-quality.md— the A/B/C/D/E source tiers you assess against.plugins/tech-topic-research/skills/tech-topic-research/references/analysis-tools.md— Confidence Criteria definitions; the Quality Checklist for Phase 7 (the qualitative checklist) and the Deep-tier numeric gates.plugins/tech-topic-research/skills/tech-topic-research/references/teaching-tone.md— to verify tone matches the user's stated familiarity level.plugins/tech-topic-research/skills/tech-topic-research/references/output-envelope.md§ Anti-fabrication — for the[unverified]cap and forbidden-zones rule you must enforce.
Assignment-input contract
The parent agent's prompt: field will contain the drafted study-guide markdown plus context:
Drafted document: <full markdown body>— the document to review.Tier claimed: standard | deep— what the parent declares.User familiarity: <level>— for tone fit.User goal: <goal>— for fit-for-purpose.
If the drafted document is missing, ask the parent agent for it.
Review checklist (measurable)
Accuracy & Balance:
- Every claim in Strengths, Weaknesses, and Alternatives carries a confidence level (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/SPECULATIVE).
- Negative / absence claims ("X does NOT support Y", "there is no Z", "no workaround exists") at HIGH/MEDIUM must cite a primary-source check (vendor API reference, official changelog) confirming the absence. An unsourced or search-only negative → flag HIGH and require downgrade to
[unverified]("not found in ") or a primary-doc citation. (Seeanalysis-tools.md§ Negative, superlative, and bundled claims.) - Superlative / comparative claims ("best", "only", "strongest", "better than X") at HIGH/MEDIUM must name the alternatives they were compared against. Unnamed comparison class → flag HIGH, require downgrade to LOW or addition of the comparison set.
- Bundled claims — a single confidence label covering ≥2 sub-claims with different support → flag MEDIUM, require splitting and re-rating each sub-claim.
- Weaknesses count >= Strengths count − 1. If only 1 weakness for 4+ strengths, flag HIGH.
- "When NOT to use" contains at least 1 concrete scenario with a real named alternative.
[unverified]claims: <= 10% of total claims; zero in Strengths, Weaknesses, or Alternatives table (forbidden zones). Per-zone violation OR > 10% global → flag HIGH.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 105 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A b61949a5ab66
synthesis-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository 85danf/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,324 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
extractor
Autonomous knowledge extraction agent. Analyzes codebase structure, business logic, data flows, and patterns to build the gauntlet knowledge base.
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
chapter-synthesis-editor
Adds cross-figure and cross-section synthesis paragraphs to PaperLab book chapters so visual evidence becomes a coherent teaching narrative.
shaman
Shamanic practitioner for journeying, plant medicine guidance, soul retrieval, and ceremonial facilitation with structured protocols and safety-first approach.
slide-auditor
Visual layout auditor for RevealJS and Beamer slides. Checks for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and spacing issues. Use proactively after creating or modifying slides.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.