meta-reviewer

An automated final reviewer for a peer-review process. It reads the submission, reviews, author response, and score changes before deciding whether the work is accepted or needs changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for issuing accept, minor-revision, major-revision, or reject decisions and listing requirements for the final publishable version.
Why use it?
It provides one closing decision after separate reviewers have given their feedback, instead of leaving the decision to an unstructured discussion.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/88plug/scientific-method/meta-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/88plug/scientific-method
Per session 99 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 728 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00099 $0.00728
Opus 5 $0.00049 $0.00364
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00073

Measured yesterday against content hash 242799646881, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

meta-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/meta-reviewer.md · 61 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 61 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 242799646881

Subscribe to this mod's changes

meta-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository 88plug/scientific-method (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 728 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.