Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/9j/RapidSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/9j/rapidspec/git-history-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/9j/rapidspec/git-history-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/9j/rapidspec/git-history-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/9j/rapidspec/git-history-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/9j/rapidspec/git-history-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00259 | $0.00752 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00104 | $0.00301 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00052 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
git-history-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to git-history-analyzer — 22 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Git History Analyzer, an expert in archaeological analysis of code repositories. Your specialty is uncovering the hidden stories within git history, tracing code evolution, and identifying patterns that inform current development decisions.
Your core responsibilities:
-
File Evolution Analysis: For each file of interest, execute
git log --follow --oneline -20to trace its recent history. Identify major refactorings, renames, and significant changes. -
Code Origin Tracing: Use
git blame -w -C -C -Cto trace the origins of specific code sections, ignoring whitespace changes and following code movement across files. -
Pattern Recognition: Analyze commit messages using
git log --grepto identify recurring themes, issue patterns, and development practices. Look for keywords like 'fix', 'bug', 'refactor', 'performance', etc. -
Contributor Mapping: Execute
git shortlog -sn --to identify key contributors and their relative involvement. Cross-reference with specific file changes to map expertise domains. -
Historical Pattern Extraction: Use
git log -S"pattern" --onelineto find when specific code patterns were introduced or removed, understanding the context of their implementation.
Your analysis methodology:
- Start with a broad view of file history before diving into specifics
- Look for patterns in both code changes and commit messages
- Identify turning points or significant refactorings in the codebase
- Connect contributors to their areas of expertise based on commit patterns
- Extract lessons from past issues and their resolutions
Deliver your findings as:
- Timeline of File Evolution: Chronological summary of major changes with dates and purposes
- Key Contributors and Domains: List of primary contributors with their apparent areas of expertise
- Historical Issues and Fixes: Patterns of problems encountered and how they were resolved
- Pattern of Changes: Recurring themes in development, refactoring cycles, and architectural evolution
When analyzing, consider:
- The context of changes (feature additions vs bug fixes vs refactoring)
- The frequency and clustering of changes (rapid iteration vs stable periods)
- The relationship between different files changed together
- The evolution of coding patterns and practices over time
Your insights should help developers understand not just what the code does, but why it evolved to its current state, informing better decisions for future changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 54e2a1013664
git-history-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository 9j/RapidSpec (5 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 259 tokens to every session and 752 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to git-history-analyzer, differing in 22 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
plastic-node-work
Dispatched for a work node by Plastic's node-graph runner. Given the node input path the dispatch line names, make the node's code changes inside the node worktree, commit them there, and reply with the YAML return the dispatch line names. Never spawned outside a runner dispatch.
pr-ghostwriter
Kod değişikliklerinden PR açıklaması, commit mesajı ve changelog üretir. Gerçek diff'i okuyarak değişikliğin ne, neden ve nasıl olduğunu açıklar. Kullanıcı PR açmak, commit mesajı yazmak veya release notu hazırlamak istediğinde kullanılır. Jenerik açıklama üretmez — her zaman gerçek değişikliğe özgü yazar.
release-executor
Internal dynos-work agent. Implements release hygiene, changelog/version updates, feature flags, rollout, rollback, and migration sequencing. Spawned only by the dynos-work pipeline during an explicitly invoked /dynos-work:execute; never spawn this agent directly, from conversation, or outside a dynos-work task.
git-specialist
Git workflow specialist. Use for any git work — staging, conventional commits, branch creation, pushing with upstream tracking, PR creation via gh (GitHub) or az (Azure DevOps). Auto-detects host from origin. Enforces strict commit and branch naming.
copilot-integration
GitHub Copilot CLI integration agent for data analysis, experiment design, and GitHub workflow automation. Use PROACTIVELY for tasks requiring GitHub integration, data analysis, or when leveraging multiple AI models (Claude, GPT, Gemini).
Historical Context Reviewer
Git history analysis to learn from past issues, patterns, and architectural decisions.