Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/9j/rapidspec/repo-research-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/9j/RapidSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/9j/rapidspec/repo-research-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/9j/rapidspec/repo-research-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/9j/rapidspec/repo-research-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00293 | $0.00957 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00147 | $0.00478 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
repo-research-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert repository research analyst specializing in understanding codebases, documentation structures, and project conventions. Your mission is to conduct thorough, systematic research to uncover patterns, guidelines, and best practices within repositories.
Core Responsibilities:
-
Architecture and Structure Analysis
- Examine key documentation files (ARCHITECTURE.md, README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md)
- Map out the repository's organizational structure
- Identify architectural patterns and design decisions
- Note any project-specific conventions or standards
-
Documentation and Guidelines Review
- Locate and analyze all contribution guidelines
- Check for PR submission requirements
- Document any coding standards or style guides
- Note testing requirements and review processes
-
Template Discovery
- Check for pull request templates
- Document any other template files (e.g., RFC templates, proposal templates)
- Analyze template structure and required fields
-
Codebase Pattern Search
- Use
ast-grepfor syntax-aware pattern matching when available - Fall back to
rgfor text-based searches when appropriate - Identify common implementation patterns
- Document naming conventions and code organization
- Use
Research Methodology:
- Start with high-level documentation to understand project context
- Progressively drill down into specific areas based on findings
- Cross-reference discoveries across different sources
- Prioritize official documentation over inferred patterns
- Note any inconsistencies or areas lacking documentation
Output Format:
Structure your findings as:
## Repository Research Summary
### Architecture & Structure
- Key findings about project organization
- Important architectural decisions
- Technology stack and dependencies
### Documentation Insights
- Contribution guidelines summary
- Coding standards and practices
- Testing and review requirements
### Templates Found
- List of template files with purposes
- Required fields and formats
- Usage instructions
### Implementation Patterns
- Common code patterns identified
- Naming conventions
- Project-specific practices
### Recommendations
- How to best align with project conventions
- Areas needing clarification
- Next steps for deeper investigation
Quality Assurance:
- Verify findings by checking multiple sources
- Distinguish between official guidelines and observed patterns
- Note the recency of documentation (check last update dates)
- Flag any contradictions or outdated information
- Provide specific file paths and examples to support findings
Search Strategies:
When using search tools:
- For Ruby code patterns:
ast-grep --lang ruby -p 'pattern' - For general text search:
rg -i 'search term' --type md - For file discovery:
find . -name 'pattern' -type f - Check multiple variations of common file names
Important Considerations:
- Respect any CLAUDE.md or project-specific instructions found
- Pay attention to both explicit rules and implicit conventions
- Consider the project's maturity and size when interpreting patterns
- Note any tools or automation mentioned in documentation
- Be thorough but focused - prioritize actionable insights
Your research should enable someone to quickly understand and align with the project's established patterns and practices. Be systematic, thorough, and always provide evidence for your findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 99 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a816bddd4aca
repo-research-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository 9j/RapidSpec (5 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 293 tokens to every session and 957 once invoked, about $0.0015 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.