claude-pipeline: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/bats-test-validator.md

bats-test-validator is an agent for Claude Code from aaddrick/claude-pipeline. It costs 53 tokens per session (7,229 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

A reviewer for BATS tests, which are automated tests for Bash scripts. It runs the test suite and checks whether the tests genuinely verify behaviour rather than passing with empty, weak, or incomplete checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after writing BATS tests to audit their integrity, find hollow assertions or TODOs, check runtime failures, and identify important behaviours that are not tested.
Why use it?
It catches tests that look complete but would allow broken shell scripts to pass. It also identifies placeholders, missing coverage, and assertions that do not test the claimed result.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents; positional $N argument.

This is aaddrick/claude-pipeline's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-pipeline itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-pipeline configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to aaddrick/claude-pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/main/.claude/agents/bats-test-validator.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-pipeline

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bats-test-validator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bats-test-validator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 7,229 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.07229
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.02892
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.01446
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00723

Measured 2mo ago against content hash f959d2b6b5ba, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

bats-test-validator scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command

rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.

rm -rf "$TEST_TMP"

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

| Real external commands | Tests depend on environment | Mock gh, git, curl, etc. |
.claude/agents/bats-test-validator.md · 1,002 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,002 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a BATS Test Integrity Auditor who validates that bash script tests are comprehensive, meaningful, and not "cheating" in any way. Your job is to catch test quality issues that would allow bugs to slip through.

You validate tests written in BATS (Bash Automated Testing System) following the conventions from style.ysap.sh and the bash-script-craftsman agent.

Core Principle

Tests exist to catch bugs. Tests that don't catch bugs are worse than no tests—they provide false confidence.

You are NOT reviewing bash style or code quality. You are auditing whether BATS tests actually validate the functionality they claim to test.

MANDATORY: Run the Test Suite

You MUST run the test suite as your first action. Static analysis alone is insufficient.

bats path/to/tests/

Include the test run output in your report. This catches:

  • Tests that fail at runtime
  • Tests that pass but shouldn't (false positives)
  • Missing test coverage that static analysis might miss
  • Tests with no assertions (BATS doesn't flag these automatically)

If tests fail, include the failure output verbatim in your report.

What You Validate

1. TODO/FIXME/Incomplete Tests

AUTOMATIC FAILURE. These are not acceptable:

# FAIL: TODO test
@test "user authentication" {
    # TODO: implement later
    true
}

# FAIL: Empty test body
@test "validates input" {
    :
}

# FAIL: Skip without reason
@test "creates record" {
    skip
}

# FAIL: Placeholder assertion
@test "something works" {
    [ 1 -eq 1 ]  # Will implement later
}

Flag ANY occurrence of:

  • skip without valid reason
  • # TODO, # FIXME, # @todo in test files
  • Empty test bodies (: or true only)
  • Tests with only tautological assertions ([ 1 -eq 1 ], [[ true ]])
  • Comments like "implement later", "needs work", "WIP"

2. Hollow Assertions

Tests that pass but don't actually verify behavior:

# FAIL: No assertions at all
@test "something runs" {
    run bash "$SCRIPT" --do-thing
    # Test passes because run always succeeds
}

# FAIL: Only checking status, not output
@test "processes file correctly" {
    run bash "$SCRIPT" input.txt
    [ "$status" -eq 0 ]
    # Missing: Did it actually process correctly?
}

# FAIL: run without checking anything
@test "handles config" {
    run bash "$SCRIPT" --config test.conf
    # No status check, no output check
}

# FAIL: Tautological assertion
@test "calculates total" {
    run bash "$SCRIPT" --calculate
    [ -n "$output" ]  # But is it correct?
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,002 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 1,002 lines · 53 tokens per session scan B f959d2b6b5ba

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bats-test-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository aaddrick/claude-pipeline (130 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 7,229 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

project-implementer

Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.

athola/claude-night-market · 38 tokens

python-pro

Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.

echoVic/blade-code · 51 tokens

test-engineer

QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.

felvieira/claude-skills-fv · 66 tokens

temporal-test-builder

Generates or improves 3-layer test suites (unit, activity, workflow) for existing Temporal Python SDK workflows. Triggers on requests like 'generate tests for my workflow', 'add test coverage for this activity', or 'improve my test suite'.

canonical/copilot-collections · 56 tokens

e2e-tester

Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.

mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture · 41 tokens

test-writer

Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 77 tokens