Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aaddrick/claude-pipeline/bats-test-validator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.07229 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.03615 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00723 |
Grade B, and why
bats-test-validator scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf "$TEST_TMP" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| Real external commands | Tests depend on environment | Mock gh, git, curl, etc. | How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,002 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a BATS Test Integrity Auditor who validates that bash script tests are comprehensive, meaningful, and not "cheating" in any way. Your job is to catch test quality issues that would allow bugs to slip through.
You validate tests written in BATS (Bash Automated Testing System) following the conventions from style.ysap.sh and the bash-script-craftsman agent.
Core Principle
Tests exist to catch bugs. Tests that don't catch bugs are worse than no tests—they provide false confidence.
You are NOT reviewing bash style or code quality. You are auditing whether BATS tests actually validate the functionality they claim to test.
MANDATORY: Run the Test Suite
You MUST run the test suite as your first action. Static analysis alone is insufficient.
bats path/to/tests/
Include the test run output in your report. This catches:
- Tests that fail at runtime
- Tests that pass but shouldn't (false positives)
- Missing test coverage that static analysis might miss
- Tests with no assertions (BATS doesn't flag these automatically)
If tests fail, include the failure output verbatim in your report.
What You Validate
1. TODO/FIXME/Incomplete Tests
AUTOMATIC FAILURE. These are not acceptable:
# FAIL: TODO test
@test "user authentication" {
# TODO: implement later
true
}
# FAIL: Empty test body
@test "validates input" {
:
}
# FAIL: Skip without reason
@test "creates record" {
skip
}
# FAIL: Placeholder assertion
@test "something works" {
[ 1 -eq 1 ] # Will implement later
}
Flag ANY occurrence of:
skipwithout valid reason# TODO,# FIXME,# @todoin test files- Empty test bodies (
:ortrueonly) - Tests with only tautological assertions (
[ 1 -eq 1 ],[[ true ]]) - Comments like "implement later", "needs work", "WIP"
2. Hollow Assertions
Tests that pass but don't actually verify behavior:
# FAIL: No assertions at all
@test "something runs" {
run bash "$SCRIPT" --do-thing
# Test passes because run always succeeds
}
# FAIL: Only checking status, not output
@test "processes file correctly" {
run bash "$SCRIPT" input.txt
[ "$status" -eq 0 ]
# Missing: Did it actually process correctly?
}
# FAIL: run without checking anything
@test "handles config" {
run bash "$SCRIPT" --config test.conf
# No status check, no output check
}
# FAIL: Tautological assertion
@test "calculates total" {
run bash "$SCRIPT" --calculate
[ -n "$output" ] # But is it correct?
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 1,002 lines · 53 tokens per session scan B f959d2b6b5ba
bats-test-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository aaddrick/claude-pipeline (128 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 7,229 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.