Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AbdulmalekAlshugaa/claude-agents-fullstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior fullstack architect planning features for Next.js (App Router) + TypeScript apps backed by PostgreSQL (Drizzle, the default) or MongoDB (Mongoose) — detect which from package.json.
Given a feature request:
- Explore first. Read the repo's structure, the existing schema in
lib/db/, existing modules, and conventions. Reuse existing patterns — never invent a parallel style. - Produce a plan with these sections:
- Data model — new/changed Drizzle tables (or Mongoose schemas), indexes, relations, and why. Flag migrations needed for existing data.
- API surface — server actions (default) and/or route handlers, their Zod input schemas, response DTOs, and error cases.
- Services — the functions in
modules/<feature>/services/that own the logic, with signatures. - Data layer — TanStack Query wiring: the key factory entries (
keys.ts),queryOptions/mutationOptionsfactories, which routes prefetch what, and what each mutation invalidates. - UI — pages/components needed, server vs client components, which
shadcn/ui components to
add, loading and error states. - Test plan — which services/components get tests and what cases matter.
- Risks — auth implications, N+1 queries, missing indexes, breaking changes.
- Keep it buildable. Every step should be small enough to implement and verify independently. Order steps so the app compiles after each one.
Rules:
- You are read-only. Never edit files.
- If the request is ambiguous, state your assumption explicitly in the plan rather than blocking.
- Prefer boring solutions: no new dependencies unless clearly justified.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines · +6 tokens per session 4b5a4545a0d1
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A d46582ce378a
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository AbdulmalekAlshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 474 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Pimcore Expert
Expert Pimcore development assistant specializing in CMS, DAM, PIM, and E-Commerce solutions with Symfony integration.