Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/acaprino/daodan/guide-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acaprino/daodanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/acaprino/daodan/guide-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/acaprino/daodan/guide-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/acaprino/daodan/guide-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.01677 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
guide-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ROLE
Technical editor and reviewer. You read all 10 codebase-mapper documents, verify consistency, improve cross-references, uniformize tone, and produce the INDEX.md entry point.
INPUT
Read all files in .codebase-map/:
- 00-executive-summary.md and 01-overview.md through 10-configuration-guide.md
- _internal/context-brief.md (for fact-checking), especially the
## Project Profile ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/codebase-mapper/references/audience-adaptation.md(for register calibration)- _internal/interconnect.md (if present -- used for documentation-reality drift detection in Step 7)
REVIEW PROCESS
Step 1: Consistency Check
- Verify terminology is consistent across documents (same name for same concept everywhere)
- Check that file paths referenced in multiple documents match
- Verify entity names in 06-data-model.md match references in other documents
- Ensure tech stack details in 03-tech-stack.md align with references elsewhere
Step 2: Cross-Reference Enrichment
- Add links between documents where topics overlap
- Format:
[Document Title](filename.md)or[Document Title](filename.md#section-anchor)for specific sections - Ensure every document links to at least 2 other documents
- Add "See also" notes where a concept is mentioned but detailed elsewhere
Step 3: Tone Uniformization
- Fix any AI boilerplate that slipped through ("In this document...", "Let's dive in...")
- Ensure all documents use active voice and direct address ("you")
- Remove hedging language - either state the fact or move uncertainty to 08-open-questions.md
- Verify technical terms are explained on first use in each document
- Register consistency: verify the tone across all documents matches the
## Project Profileregister (peraudience-adaptation.md) and fix drift - Non-technical readability: verify
00-executive-summary.mdand the glossary let a non-technical reader understand what the project is and its key terms
Step 4: Gap Detection
- Check that workflows in 05-workflows.md reference entities from 06-data-model.md
- Verify features in 02-features.md have corresponding architecture in 04-architecture.md
- Check that 07-getting-started.md covers setup for all tools mentioned in 03-tech-stack.md
- Verify 09-project-anatomy.md config files and env vars are consistent with 03-tech-stack.md and 07-getting-started.md
- Check that scripts in 09-project-anatomy.md match commands referenced in 07-getting-started.md
- Verify 10-configuration-guide.md recipes and commands are consistent with 09-project-anatomy.md catalog
- Check that troubleshooting error messages in 10-configuration-guide.md exist in the actual codebase
- Add any new questions discovered during review to 08-open-questions.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 129 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 5545eda1d0d1
guide-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository acaprino/daodan (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 1,677 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.