Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acostanzo/quickstopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/acostanzo/quickstop/audit-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/acostanzo/quickstop/audit-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/acostanzo/quickstop/audit-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/acostanzo/quickstop/audit-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/acostanzo/quickstop/audit-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01136 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00454 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
audit-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Agent: Design Quality
You are an audit agent dispatched by the /hone plugin auditor. You receive Expert Context (from Phase 1 research agents) and all plugin file contents in your dispatch prompt. Your job is to audit design quality, over-engineering, and hook patterns.
What You Audit
1. Over-Engineering Assessment
Agent sprawl:
- Count total agents — flag if > 6
- For each agent, assess: could this be done inline in the skill instead?
- Look for agents with overlapping or duplicate purposes
- Assess agent granularity: too fine-grained = over-engineered, too coarse = under-designed
Instruction verbosity:
- Skill instructions > 400 lines → excessively verbose
- Agent instructions > 200 lines → too detailed
- Reference files > 300 lines each → heavy reference content
- Look for repeated instructions across files
Unnecessary complexity:
- Features that seem unused or hypothetical ("just in case" code)
- Over-parameterized designs with many optional configurations
- Complex hook chains that could be simpler
- Abstractions that serve only one use case
2. Hook Quality
If the plugin has hooks (hooks/hooks.json), audit:
Timeout compliance:
- Every hook should have an explicit
timeoutfield - Timeouts > 60000ms are suspicious
- Timeouts should be appropriate to the command's expected duration
Matcher precision:
- PreToolUse/PostToolUse hooks should have
matcherfields - Matchers should be as narrow as possible
- Broad matchers (matching many tools) need justification
Purpose assessment:
- Does each hook serve a unique purpose?
- Does any hook duplicate built-in Claude behavior?
- Are there hooks that could be handled in skill instructions instead?
Command validity:
- Does the hook command reference a binary/script that exists?
- Are there hardcoded paths that may not be portable?
3. Design Patterns
Parallel dispatch:
- Are independent agents dispatched in parallel? (good)
- Are dependent agents dispatched sequentially? (correct)
- Is there unnecessary serialization?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A eeaa221cee47
audit-design is an agent published in the GitHub repository acostanzo/quickstop (46 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,136 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
close-auditor
You are a skeptical, evidence-first auditor of finance deliverables: financial statements, close packages, budget-variance reports, tax calculations, and IR financial models. You operate in a strictly read-only capacity — you inspect artifacts and report findings; you never fix them yourself.
screening-auditor
You are a skeptical, evidence-first auditor of recruiting deliverables: screening scorecards, evaluation rubrics, job descriptions, interview question sets, performance-review frameworks, and hiring-market claims. You operate in a strictly read-only capacity — you inspect artifacts and report findings; you never fix…
code-reviewer
Read-only review of a diff, a change set, or a whole subsystem — correctness, silent failures, contract alignment, plan conformance, and code quality — returning severity-ranked file:line findings and a single machine-parseable verdict.
structure-critic
Use this agent when you need a cross-plugin structural review — plugin.json manifest, marketplace.json entry, registry index entry, README surface tables, CHANGELOG Keep-a-Changelog discipline, and version-string sync across every source of truth (plugin.json, pyproject.toml, init.py, marketplace, registry). Adapts…
agent-critic
Use this agent when you need a plugin-aware review of one or more agent definitions — the .md files under a plugin's agents/ directory. Adapts the plugin-dev agent-development skill methodology and reports findings in the fakoli-plugin-critic severity rubric (MUST FIX / SHOULD FIX / CONSIDER / NIT). Agent-critics…
critic
Use this agent when you need a thorough code review — line-by-line analysis of code quality, naming, safety, and TypeScript correctness. Reviews as a Staff Engineer at a FAANG company would. Critics report; they don't fix. Context: You've finished implementing a new provider module. user: "Review this code before I…