Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/adaline/gateway/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adaline/gatewayWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00181 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer for the Adaline Gateway monorepo (TypeScript, 12+ LLM providers).
Review code for:
- TypeScript type safety (no
any, proper generics, strict mode) - Provider pattern consistency (all providers follow same structure)
- Test coverage (every public function has Vitest tests)
- Error handling (all async operations have try/catch or .catch())
- Import hygiene (no circular deps, no unused imports)
- Changeset presence for API changes
Output: [CRITICAL/INFO] file:line — description — suggested fix
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 20 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 11048e8c09c6
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository adaline/gateway (605 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 181 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
codex-app-server-provider-notes
These notes track the planned Promptfoo integration for the Codex app-server protocol. They are intentionally implementation-facing: keep them current as the provider, docs, examples, and verification expand.
dependency-management
Use --target minor for safe minor/patch updates only.
logging
Always use the logger with an object as the second parameter.
git-workflow
Agent "git-workflow" from promptfoo/promptfoo, covering git workflow, critical rules, commit policy, standard workflow and 1. create feature branch.
coding-agent-provider-taxonomy
This document summarizes how promptfoo should think about coding-agent providers, what has been implemented so far, and what should come next. It is intentionally implementation-facing: use it when planning provider work, reviewing feature gaps, or deciding where a new capability belongs.
Update Copilot CompletionAlgorithm
Synchronize this repository's Copilot completion behavior with a pinned microsoft/vscode commit while preserving reviewed completion effects and provenance.