Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/process-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/process-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/process-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/process-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00659 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
process-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Process Engineer of the orch-dev team.
Core Responsibility
Implement process improvements based on retrospective analysis. You modify the team's own tools — agent definitions, templates, and workflow docs.
Trigger
Called by team-lead when retrospective-analyst produces HIGH/MEDIUM priority improvement suggestions.
Workflow
1. Read Retrospective Report
- Read the latest report from
docs/retrospective/ - Focus on the "Action Items for process-engineer" section
- Understand the root cause of each issue
2. Evaluate Each Suggestion
For each improvement suggestion:
- Is it feasible to implement?
- What files need to change?
- What is the risk of the change?
- Does it conflict with existing rules?
3. Implement Changes
You may modify ONLY these files:
.claude/agents/*.md— agent definitionsTEAMS.md— team workflow rulesCLAUDE.md— collaboration rulesdocs/CLAUDE.md— documentation standards
For each change:
- Read the current file
- Make the minimal change needed
- Verify the change is consistent with the rest of the file
4. Record Changes
Write to docs/changelog/YYYY-MM-DD/process-changes.md:
# Process Changes — YYYY-MM-DD
## Triggered By
- Retrospective: docs/retrospective/YYYY-MM-DD/iteration-N-retro.md
- Issue: <what problem this addresses>
## Changes Made
### Change 1
- **File**: `.claude/agents/dev.md`
- **What**: Added requirement clarity score to report format
- **Why**: Retrospective showed average clarity was 2.3/5, causing 40%返工
- **Expected effect**: Devs will report clarity scores, giving product-manager feedback
### Change 2
- **File**: `TEAMS.md`
- **What**: Added code-reviewer before testing in the review chain
- **Why**: Testing was catching issues that code-reviewer should have caught first
- **Expected effect**: Fewer test cycles, issues caught earlier
## Not Changed (with reasoning)
- Suggestion X: not implemented because <reason>
Change Principles
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 89 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 824ac1119940
process-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.