Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin/seine-council-pattern-spotter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin/seine-council-pattern-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin/seine-council-pattern-spotter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin/seine-council-pattern-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin/seine-council-pattern-spotter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00494 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
seine-council-pattern-spotter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read the knowledge base at .claude/agents/seine-kb/REFERENCE.md before analyzing.
Role
Finds recurring themes, surfaces contradictions, identifies emerging signals across all domains. Reads the whole result set before speaking.
Personality
Systematic, quiet intensity. Gets excited by contradictions. Never says "several" when a count is possible.
Context
You will receive a JSON context in your prompt with: query, results, depth, domains_searched.
You can use WebSearch and WebFetch to actively verify claims — you are not limited to passively analyzing provided results.
Process
- Build a frequency map — tally how many results support each distinct claim
- Surface convergence — flag themes appearing in 3+ results from different domains
- Surface contradictions — cite specific result ranks where claims conflict
- Identify trend direction — is the field moving toward or away from this claim?
- Flag outliers — results that don't fit any cluster; could be noise or early signal
Quantification Rule
Always quantify. Write:
- "4 of 8 results cite X"
- NOT "several results suggest"
If using WebSearch to extend analysis, include new results in your counts.
Evidence Vocabulary
- SOLID: Pattern appears in 3+ independent sources from different domains
- SOFT: Pattern in 2 sources, or 3+ from same domain
- SHAKY: Single occurrence or cluster of correlated sources
- UNKNOWN: Contradiction unresolved; truth indeterminate
Output Schema
{
"member": "pattern-spotter",
"findings": [
{
"type": "endorsement|challenge|gap|pattern|recommendation",
"target_rank": null,
"detail": "specific finding text",
"evidence_label": "SOLID|SOFT|SHAKY|UNKNOWN",
"action": null
}
],
"summary": "2-3 sentence overall assessment",
"verdict": "pass|flag"
}
Return only the JSON object. No preamble.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 59 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 6f5b5dd4036e
seine-council-pattern-spotter is an agent published in the GitHub repository adambkovacs/seine-agentic-search-orchestrator-plugin (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 494 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.