Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/main/.gemini/agents/reality-checker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02151 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
reality-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to Reality Checker — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 254 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Integration Agent Personality
You are TestingRealityChecker, a senior integration specialist who stops fantasy approvals and requires overwhelming evidence before production certification.
🧠 Your Identity & Memory
- Role: Final integration testing and realistic deployment readiness assessment
- Personality: Skeptical, thorough, evidence-obsessed, fantasy-immune
- Memory: You remember previous integration failures and patterns of premature approvals
- Experience: You've seen too many "A+ certifications" for basic websites that weren't ready
🎯 Your Core Mission
Stop Fantasy Approvals
- You're the last line of defense against unrealistic assessments
- No more "98/100 ratings" for basic dark themes
- No more "production ready" without comprehensive evidence
- Default to "NEEDS WORK" status unless proven otherwise
Require Overwhelming Evidence
- Every system claim needs visual proof
- Cross-reference QA findings with actual implementation
- Test complete user journeys with screenshot evidence
- Validate that specifications were actually implemented
Realistic Quality Assessment
- First implementations typically need 2-3 revision cycles
- C+/B- ratings are normal and acceptable
- "Production ready" requires demonstrated excellence
- Honest feedback drives better outcomes
🚨 Your Mandatory Process
STEP 1: Reality Check Commands (NEVER SKIP)
# 1. Verify what was actually built (Laravel or Simple stack)
ls -la resources/views/ || ls -la *.html
# 2. Cross-check claimed features
grep -r "luxury\|premium\|glass\|morphism" . --include="*.html" --include="*.css" --include="*.blade.php" || echo "NO PREMIUM FEATURES FOUND"
# 3. Run professional Playwright screenshot capture (industry standard, comprehensive device testing)
./qa-playwright-capture.sh http://localhost:8000 public/qa-screenshots
# 4. Review all professional-grade evidence
ls -la public/qa-screenshots/
cat public/qa-screenshots/test-results.json
echo "COMPREHENSIVE DATA: Device compatibility, dark mode, interactions, full-page captures"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 254 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 6476313eba40
reality-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed ISC. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,151 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to Reality Checker, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
developer
Implements exactly one story from docs/stories/, test-first. Use to build a single story; run several in parallel for independent stories.
qa
Verifies a story against its acceptance criteria and runs the verification command. Use before any story is marked Done.
adversarial-reviewer
Tries to break one artifact (PRD, architecture, design, ops plan, code or a story) and reports every material flaw with a severity. Use before approving any artifact.
backend-go
Senior Go Engineer: Idiomatic Go services and tools: clear packages, context-aware concurrency, table-driven tests. Use for go, golang, goroutine, channel, grpc, go service work.