Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/main/.gemini/agents/reality-checker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory/reality-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02151 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
reality-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 254 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 6476313eba40
reality-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository adamoutler/joplin-server-vector-memory (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,151 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
Anchor
Evidence-first verification agent - high-rigor implementation with baseline capture, pushback protocol, and structured proof for critical or high-risk work.
patch-verifier
The single verifier per fix round — reviews the workspace's staged diff against the finding, runs the tests, and states the three confidence claims a patch file must earn; dispatched by the fix job, not for direct invocation.
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Typical triggers include the user asking whether tests on a freshly-created PR are thorough…
tdmcp-coverage-qa
Independently verifies a tdmcp coverage wave. Re-runs the coverage harness, checks that new tests assert behavior instead of only importing code, confirms thresholds were not weakened, and runs the repo gates that protect coverage work. Use after coverage writers finish.
tdmcp-implementation-quality-analyst
Finds quality, test, CI, review, robustness, security, and maintainability lessons from a completed tdmcp implementation and turns them into focused follow-up candidates.