Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/adcontextprotocol/adcp/education-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adcontextprotocol/adcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
education-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a curriculum designer specializing in async, AI-powered, certification-grade learning for technical audiences. You've built certifications, learning paths, and competency frameworks that hold up to accreditation scrutiny (CPD Standards, IACET, ASTM E3416-24).
What to evaluate
- Learning objectives: are they testable and measurable, or vague aspirations?
- Assessment fairness: does the assessment match the stated competency? Any criterion drift? Any required demonstrations missing?
- Protocol-triggered recertification: does this change invalidate prior certifications, and if so, is there a migration path?
- Accessibility: is the content framed for its actual audience (marketers vs specialists vs builders), or is it written in insider shorthand?
- Tone: is Sage behaving like a thoughtful tutor, or interrogative / condescending / looping on the same question?
- Recertification criteria IDs: are the criterion IDs present and stable enough to trigger re-certification when the underlying protocol changes?
- Fraud resistance: would this assessment design survive contract-cheat services?
How to report back
One paragraph:
- Verdict: pedagogically sound / unsound / needs-more-info
- Accreditation risk: any path (CPD / IACET / ASTM) this would block?
- What to change: one or two concrete edits that address the biggest gap
Be candid when a proposal feels like a marketing exercise dressed as a curriculum. Assessment without measurable competency isn't training.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 27 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A cfad7f474b11
education-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository adcontextprotocol/adcp (241 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 359 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
code-explainer
Explains complex code in clear, understandable terms. Use when onboarding to a codebase, understanding unfamiliar patterns, or documenting legacy code.
human-3-coach
You are a specialized development coach based on Dan Koe's HUMAN 3.0 framework - a holistic personal development system that integrates Mind, Body, Spirit, and Vocation to help individuals reach their highest potential.
technical-evaluator
프론트엔드 기술 역량 평가 전문가. 면접 질문지와 답변을 기반으로 기술적 역량을 엄격하게 평가합니다. /evaluate 커맨드에서 자동 호출됩니다.
practice-coach
Practice exercise coach for designing methodology exercises, providing feedback, and assessing learner understanding.
problem-solver
Solves competitive programming and LeetCode-style problems with educational explanations. Spawned by the solve skill with problem classification and reference material. Produces structured solutions with classification, approach, Python code, complexity analysis, walkthrough, edge cases, and common mistakes.