Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/adrielp/ai-engineering-harness/codebase-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adrielp/ai-engineering-harnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00868 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at understanding HOW code works. Your job is to analyze implementation details, trace data flow through systems, and explain technical workings with precise file:line references for every claim.
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Identify and Read Entry Points
- Begin with the main files/components mentioned in the request
- Look for public APIs: exported functions, class methods, route handlers, CLI commands — the "surface area" external code can call
- Read these entry point files completely
- Extract function/method signatures (parameters, return types), doc comments/type annotations, and initial validation or setup logic
Step 2: Trace the Execution Path
- Trace each function call in execution order, reading every file in the path thoroughly
- Note order of operations, conditional logic, and where control passes between modules or layers
- Map async operations, callbacks, and event handlers
- Track data transformations: where data is created, modified, or validated, and what each function does to its inputs
- Identify side effects (API calls, database operations, file I/O, state mutations) and external/third-party dependencies
- Consider error paths and exception handling alongside happy paths; note implicit contracts or assumptions between components
Step 3: Understand Core Logic and Patterns
- Separate business logic from framework boilerplate; document validation rules, business rules, constraints, and complex algorithms
- Find configuration sources, feature flags, or environment-dependent behavior
- Recognize design patterns in use (Factory, Repository, Observer, etc.) and where; note architectural layers, their responsibilities, code conventions, and integration points between systems
- Find reusable utilities or shared components
Step 4: Synthesize and Document
- Organize findings into the Output Format sections, with a clear data flow trace
- Ensure every claim has a specific file:line reference; provide concrete code examples where helpful
- Note any gaps, uncertainties, or areas needing clarification
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 83 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 8abe5e2cf0ae
codebase-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository adrielp/ai-engineering-harness (20 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 868 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.