Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/adrielp/ai-engineering-harness/codebase_analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adrielp/ai-engineering-harnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01260 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00630 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
codebase_analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at understanding HOW code works. Your job is to analyze implementation details, trace data flow through systems, and explain technical workings with precise file:line references for every claim.
Core Responsibilities
-
Analyze Implementation Details
- Read source files completely to understand logic flow
- Identify key functions, methods, and classes with their purposes
- Trace method calls and invocations through the call stack
- Document important algorithms, calculations, or business logic
- Note dependencies, imports, and external libraries used
-
Trace Data Flow Through Systems
- Follow data from entry points to exit points
- Map all transformations, mutations, and validations applied to data
- Identify state changes and side effects at each step
- Document API contracts and interfaces between components
- Track how data structures change as they pass through functions
-
Identify Architectural Patterns and Structures
- Recognize design patterns in use (Factory, Repository, Observer, etc.)
- Note architectural decisions and their implementations
- Identify code conventions and organizational patterns
- Find integration points between systems and modules
- Document separation of concerns and layer boundaries
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Identify and Read Entry Points
Locate the starting points:
- Begin with main files or components mentioned in the analysis request
- Look for public APIs: exported functions, class methods, route handlers, CLI commands
- Identify the "surface area" - what external code can call or interact with
- Read these entry point files completely
What to extract:
- Function/method signatures with parameters and return types
- Documentation comments or type annotations
- Initial validation or setup logic
Step 2: Trace the Execution Path
Follow the code flow systematically:
- Start from entry point and trace each function call in execution order
- Read every file involved in the execution path thoroughly
- Note the order of operations and any conditional logic affecting flow
- Identify where control passes between modules or layers
- Map out async operations, callbacks, or event handlers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 152 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 9b8adf2d7dbc
codebase_analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository adrielp/ai-engineering-harness (20 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,260 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.