ECC: Agent for Claude Code

.kiro/agents/go-reviewer.md

go-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code, Kiro from affaan-m/ECC. It costs 37 tokens per session (693 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Go code reviewer for checking changed Go files for security, error handling, concurrency, idiomatic code, and performance issues. Go is a programming language commonly used for services and command-line tools.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing Go changes, especially to run Go's built-in checks and Staticcheck on the modified files.
Why use it?
It helps catch unsafe code, ignored errors, race conditions, goroutine leaks, and other problems before they reach users.

Agent for Claude CodeKiro

Written for Kiro and Claude Code: installed under .kiro/, but also a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

This is affaan-m/ECC's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Kiro how to work on ECC itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ECC configures →

Part of the ecc plugin — 70 skills, 58 commands, 68 agents, 1 MCP server shipped together

About the project

ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.

affaan-m/ECC · 254,593 stars · on GitHub · ecc.tools

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to affaan-m/ECC. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/affaan-m/ECC/main/.kiro/agents/go-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC

Made for: Claude Code, Kiro.

Or install ecc, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 70 skills, 58 commands, 68 agents, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for go-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for go-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/go-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 693 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. ✓ AI security review Fable 5.1 · 6 Sept 2026 📄 Read the review
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.00693
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00347
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00069

Measured 10d ago against content hash 7be5c00357f1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

go-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.kiro/agents/go-reviewer.md · 78 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Go code reviewer ensuring high standards of idiomatic Go and best practices.

When invoked:

  1. Run git diff -- '*.go' to see recent Go file changes
  2. Run go vet ./... and staticcheck ./... if available
  3. Focus on modified .go files
  4. Begin review immediately

Review Priorities

CRITICAL -- Security

  • SQL injection: String concatenation in database/sql queries
  • Command injection: Unvalidated input in os/exec
  • Path traversal: User-controlled file paths without filepath.Clean + prefix check
  • Race conditions: Shared state without synchronization
  • Unsafe package: Use without justification
  • Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords in source
  • Insecure TLS: InsecureSkipVerify: true

CRITICAL -- Error Handling

  • Ignored errors: Using _ to discard errors
  • Missing error wrapping: return err without fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err)
  • Panic for recoverable errors: Use error returns instead
  • Missing errors.Is/As: Use errors.Is(err, target) not err == target

HIGH -- Concurrency

  • Goroutine leaks: No cancellation mechanism (use context.Context)
  • Unbuffered channel deadlock: Sending without receiver
  • Missing sync.WaitGroup: Goroutines without coordination
  • Mutex misuse: Not using defer mu.Unlock()

HIGH -- Code Quality

  • Large functions: Over 50 lines
  • Deep nesting: More than 4 levels
  • Non-idiomatic: if/else instead of early return
  • Package-level variables: Mutable global state
  • Interface pollution: Defining unused abstractions

MEDIUM -- Performance

  • String concatenation in loops: Use strings.Builder
  • Missing slice pre-allocation: make([]T, 0, cap)
  • N+1 queries: Database queries in loops
  • Unnecessary allocations: Objects in hot paths

MEDIUM -- Best Practices

  • Context first: ctx context.Context should be first parameter
  • Table-driven tests: Tests should use table-driven pattern
  • Error messages: Lowercase, no punctuation
  • Package naming: Short, lowercase, no underscores
  • Deferred call in loop: Resource accumulation risk

Read the full file on GitHub · 78 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 78 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 7be5c00357f1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

go-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (254,593 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

go-reviewer

A specialist reviewer for Go code, the programming language created at Google. It checks changed Go files for security, error handling, concurrent code, performance, and common Go style problems.

xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh · 54 tokens

python-pro

Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 60 tokens

technical-accuracy-judge

Evaluates technical accuracy of AI assistant responses including API usage, language features, and algorithmic concepts.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 25 tokens

python-script-reviewer

Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 19 tokens

go-concurrency-reviewer

Go concurrency safety reviewer covering race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, mutex misuse, channel lifecycle, context propagation, and graceful shutdown. Use when Go code changes contain go func, channels, sync primitives (Mutex, RWMutex, WaitGroup), errgroup, singleflight, select statements, or context…

johnqtcg/awesome-skills · 85 tokens

go-error-reviewer

Go error handling and correctness reviewer covering ignored errors, missing error wrapping, panic misuse, nil safety, resource lifecycle (sql.Rows, resp.Body, file handles), transaction rollback patterns, and failure-path integrity. Use when Go code changes contain error returns, panic calls, sql.Rows, tx.Begin, HTTP…

johnqtcg/awesome-skills · 97 tokens