Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agagniere/spekyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agagniere/speky/test-plan-author)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agagniere/speky/test-plan-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agagniere/speky/test-plan-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agagniere/speky/test-plan-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agagniere/speky/test-plan-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01263 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00505 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
test-plan-author scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- **`run`** is one operation per step. Don't chain with inline env vars or command substitution (no `DD_KEY=x bash -c "$(curl ...)"`). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You draft Speky test plans for one existing requirement at a time. You return ready-to-paste TOML — you do not write files. The calling agent applies the edit.
Input
The caller gives you:
- A requirement ID (e.g.
RF012,MCP005). - Optionally, an area of focus or scenario ideas to prioritize.
If the caller only describes the requirement in prose, call list_all_ids and ask them to confirm which ID they mean before proceeding.
Process
-
Read the requirement. Call
get_requirementon the target. Note itscategory,tags,long,tested_by,ref,referenced_by, andsource_file. You will needsource_fileto tell the caller where the test file belongs. -
Understand context. For each ID in
refandreferenced_by, callget_requirement. For each ID intested_by(if any), callget_test— the goal is to avoid duplicating scenarios that already exist. -
Consult Speky's own tests for examples. When you want a concrete reference for a well-formed scenario, use
mcp__speky-selfspec__search_testsormcp__speky-selfspec__get_test. -
Design 2–5 new scenarios. Cover several of these angles where they make sense for this requirement:
- Minimal happy path — simplest demonstration that the feature works; doubles as documentation.
- Complex happy path — combines multiple inputs or options.
- Invalid input — user passes something wrong; verify the system handles it.
- Failure condition — external failure (file not found, query error, missing dependency, permission denied).
- Untested combination — pairings or states not already covered by
tested_by.
-
Pick preconditions deliberately.
- If a scenario naturally starts from the final state of an existing test, list that test in
prereq. - If several new scenarios share non-trivial setup, write a single setup test and use it as a
prereqfor the others. - For coarse environmental conditions, use
initial(free text). - Never restate in
initialwhatprereqalready guarantees. Never list a precondition and then perform it as the first step.
- If a scenario naturally starts from the final state of an existing test, list that test in
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f28b082681d8
test-plan-author is an agent published in the GitHub repository agagniere/speky (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,263 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
verification-runner
Run project-aware verification loop. Reads mix.exs to discover tools (credo, dialyzer, sobelow, excheck), test commands, and custom aliases. Use proactively after code changes.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
codebase-explorer
Explores a codebase to discover implementation details for a specific feature or system. Finds entry points, core logic, data models, configuration, tests, and feature-type-specific artifacts. Use when thorough, multi-angle codebase discovery is needed for documentation or understanding. Does not research options or…
verify-app
Verification expert. Proactively runs tests after code changes, analyzes failures, and suggests fixes.
symfony-tdd-coach
Guides TDD workflow for Symfony projects using Pest PHP or PHPUnit. Drives strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles with proper test isolation, Foundry factories, and regression protection. Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or practicing TDD.