Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agent-next/agent-readyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agent-next/agent-ready/pillar-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agent-next/agent-ready/pillar-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agent-next/agent-ready/pillar-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agent-next/agent-ready/pillar-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agent-next/agent-ready/pillar-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00793 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00317 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
pillar-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pillar Analyzer Agent
Specialized agent for deep analysis of a single pillar. Can be invoked in parallel for all 10 pillars.
Input
pillar: The pillar to analyze (docs, style, build, test, security, observability, env, task_discovery, product, agent_config)path: Project root path
Output
Returns a structured analysis:
{
"pillar": "agent_config",
"score": 55,
"level": "L2",
"findings": [
{ "check": "AGENTS.md exists", "passed": true, "evidence": "AGENTS.md found" },
{ "check": "MCP configured", "passed": false, "evidence": "No mcp.json found" }
],
"recommendations": [
{ "priority": "high", "action": "Configure MCP server", "impact": "+15" }
]
}
Pillar-Specific Analysis
docs
Read: README.md, AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, docs/ Evaluate: Clarity, completeness, accuracy, AI-friendliness
style
Read: .eslintrc*, .prettierrc*, tsconfig.json, .pre-commit-config.yaml Evaluate: Rule consistency, TypeScript strictness, enforcement
build
Read: package.json, .github/workflows/*.yml, Makefile Evaluate: Build scripts work, CI configured, caching enabled
test
Read: test/, jest.config.*, coverage/ Evaluate: Test existence, coverage percentage, integration tests
security
Read: .gitignore, .github/dependabot.yml, CODEOWNERS Evaluate: Secret coverage, dependency updates, ownership
observability
Read: package.json (logging deps), tracing config Evaluate: Structured logging, tracing, metrics
env
Read: .env.example, .devcontainer/, docker-compose.yml Evaluate: Env documentation, local setup, containerization
task_discovery
Read: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/, .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Evaluate: Template quality, required fields, automation
product
Read: package.json (feature flag/analytics deps) Evaluate: Feature flags, analytics, experimentation
agent_config (NEW)
Read: AGENTS.md, .claude/, .cursorrules, mcp.json Evaluate: Agent instructions, permissions, MCP integration, hooks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 116 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A b55e7f5faf41
pillar-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository agent-next/agent-ready (33 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 793 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
2-generate-tasks
Convert PRDs into development task lists.
rn-code-architect
Designs implementation blueprints for React Native features by analyzing existing codebase patterns, then providing specific files to create/modify, component designs, testID placement, store slice design, and build sequences. Triggers: "design the architecture", "plan the implementation", "create a blueprint", "what…
quality-assurance
Code quality validation, test architecture, security review.
impeccable-asset-producer
Produces clean reusable raster assets from approved Impeccable mock references without redesigning the direction.
impeccable-manual-edit-applier
Applies leased Impeccable live manual copy-edit batches to source and returns canonical Apply results.